Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pearson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$245kEducation$184kCommunity Improvement$118kArts & Culture$91kYouth Development$43kHealth$40kHuman Services$13kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Richmond$45,000
Youth Life Foundation of Richmond$16,530
Steward School$13,075
Collegiate School$6,000
CASA$1,000
Massey Cancer Center$1,000
Wounded Warrior$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%East West Communities Foundation: $51k → 7%East West Communities Foundation: $50k → 7%East West Communities Foundation: $26k → 7%East West Communities Foundation: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$600k · 17 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$600k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

53%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    5× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +12%
  • TS
    THE STEWARD SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +16%
  • TC
    THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HC
    Halifax Co Historical Society
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
  • YL
    Young Life Foundation of Richmond
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Robert Treat Academy Charter School

The organization offers children ages five and older an opportunity to learn and grow in a safe and stimulating academic environment in which the core subjects of language arts, mathematics, science, technology, social science and world…

Unclassified
11
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical College of Va Foundation; the most unlike its peers is All in All the Time. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EWC Foundation: $110,000 · OtherEWC FoundationHalifax Co Historical Society: $90,000 · OtherHalifax Co Historical SocietyYLFR: $79,325 · OtherYLFRYOUTH LIFE FOUNDATION OF RICHMOND: $43,030 · OtherYOUTH LIFE FOUNDATION OF RICHMONDTHE STEWARD SCHOOL: $32,075 · OtherTHE STEWARD SCHOOLYoung Life Foundation of Richmond: $18,904 · Other+17 more: $53,035 · Other+17 moreUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $125,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMONDTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $20,500 · EducationTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOLMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $15,500 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FO…The East West Communities Foundation: $133,900 · Human ServicesThe East West Commun…GERARD'S HOUSE: $10,000 · HealthWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $7,450 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthALL IN ALL THE TIME: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropySTAVNA BALLET INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$426,369Education$161,250Human Services$133,900Health$25,450Philanthropy$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe East West Communities Foundation: $133,900 over 4y, 40% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $125,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH LIFE FOUNDATION OF RICHMOND: $43,030 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE STEWARD SCHOOL: $32,075 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $7,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILLWOOD SCHOOL: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The East West Communities Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH LIFE FOUNDATION OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MILLWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL IN ALL THE TIME ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds STAVNA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mary Morton Parsons FoundationVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pearson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pearson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pearson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pearson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pearson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph