How much did Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

july fireworks

2022

orchestrafood

2023

—

2024

tulsaanimal rescueunitbaptist churchchristian churchgodsymphony orchestra

2025

baptist churchpleasant valleyvalley baptistcatherine catholiccatholic churcholive baptistwitnesses

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k38 grants · $115k
$10k–50k2 grants · $30k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$72M

Total assets

Largest grants

First Baptist Church$20,000
Barnsdall First Assembly of God$10,000
Wild Heart Ranch Wildlife Rescue$5,000
Aim High Center$5,000
First Christian Church$5,000
Skiatook Paws and Claws Animal Rescue$5,000
Nowata Senior Citizens$3,500
His Life Church$3,000
Trinity Church$3,000
Delaware Methodist$3,000
Little Flock Baptist Church$3,000
Central Church of Christ$3,000
Full Gospel Christian Church$3,000
Armstrong Community Church$3,000
Hillside Christian Church$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$114k · 7 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$114k

$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%

+77%

Still filing today

29%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionScience & TechHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CO
City of Nowata
3× · 2022–2024 · $82k
LW
Living Word Family Church
2× · 2021–2024 · $8k
AH
Aim High Center
2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue -57%

Funded once

CO
City of Nowata Oklahoma
one grant, 2021 · $6k
DU
Delaware United Methodist Church
one grant, 2023 · $5k
WF
Wikimedia Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tulsa Spca

Animals

Animal Aid of Tulsa Inc

Animal Aid is a private welfare organization dedicated to saving sick and injured dogs and cats, helping pets find loving homes, helping reunite lost and found pets with their owners and encouraging respect and awareness for the rights of…

Animals

Humane Society of Taos Inc

Stray Hearts is a no-kill animal shelter and adoption facility providing humane care and shelter for more than 1,500 surrendered, abandoned and abused companion animals per year.

Animals

S O S Animal Adoption Center

Rescue, neuter, and find homes for stray and abandoned dogs and cats.

Animals

Oklahoma Alliance for Animals Inc

The Oklahoma Alliance for Animals is dedicated to reducing per overpopulation. Promoting responsible pet ownership and promoting the humane treatment of animals through community collaboration and education.

Animals

Country Roads Animal Rescue Society

501C3 Non Profit Animal Rescue based In Oklahoma. We help to find animals that are in tough situations kill shelters or owner surrender. We intensely vet our animals and our adopters. We fully rely on Donations to Operate. CRAR has had…

Animals

Paws in Need Tulsa Inc

The purpose of Paws in Need Tulsa, Inc. is to provide comfort, care, and hope to the Tulsa area's homeless animal population by raising and distributing funds for: veterinary expenses, transport costs, supplies for fosters, boarding costs…

Animals

Oklahoma Primate Sanctuary Inc

To provide monkeys retired from research and rescued from the pet trade and other abusive situations with permanent refuge and companionship in safe and healthy habitats.

Animals

Oklahoma Paws

To assist in the ongoing battle of pet overpopulation in Oklahoma by offering a no kill shelter environment, responsible adoption, medical aid, and community outreach. We also intend to provide sanctuary to companion animals who's people…

Animals

The Pet Food Pantry of Oklahoma

Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…

Animals

Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle Animal Foundation (SAF), is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. Since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals

Okmulgee County Humane Society

The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spay Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Software in the Public Interest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

13%

518/3,990

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

9/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$215,343Animals$13,500Food & Nutrition$7,500Arts & Culture$7,500Science & Tech$3,500Education$2,500Human Services$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sharna and Irvin Frank FoundationOK18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · Community Food Bank of Eastern · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Aim High Center.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 845094559 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Aim High Center, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pearl M & Julia J Harmon Foundation?

More from the funding graph