Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peak Benevolent Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
9
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$117kEducation$62kCivil Rights$43kHuman Services$36kArts & Culture$25kMembership Benefit$20kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k19 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Freedom Covenant Church$19,000
Freedom Unbridled Inc$16,000
HARLAXTON COLLEGE OF THE UNIVERSITY$15,000
RIPON COLLEGE$6,000
International House of Prayer KC$5,000
WANDA MEMORIAL CEMETERY ASSOC$5,000
Shalom Ministries Inc$4,000
WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Freedom Fire Urban Ministries$2,000
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$2,000
CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES$2,000
RIVERBEND FAMILY MINISTRIES$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%CARITAS: $2k → 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%CARITAS: $2k → 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%CARITAS: $1k → 10%CARITAS: $1k → 10%The Restore Network: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 18 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$206k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+38%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
ReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RIPON COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +58%
  • CF
    CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +9%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • SM
    SHALOM MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +22%
  • BH
    BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +897%
  • CL
    CITY LIT THEATRE COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Center for Christianity and Public Life

To contend for the credibility of christian resources in public life, for the public good.

Religion
4
Christian Living Communities

Christian living communities enriches the quality and dignity of life for older adults through services and care that reflect christian love, respect, and compassion toward each individual.

Housing & Shelter
5
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
6
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
7
Christian Resources International

Free worldwide distribution of christian literature

Religion
8
Faith for Culture

To explore and promote the faith journeys and insights of christian believers in many spheres of culture.

Human Services
9
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
10
Cts America Inc

To deliver the gospel of the lord jesus christ by broadcasting television

Religion
11
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
12
C4I Christians for Israel

To present a biblical perspective of god's plans and purpose for israel and the church

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hope Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is City Lit Theatre Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREEDOM UNBRIDLED INC: $38,000 · OtherFREEDOM UNBRIDLED INCHARLAXTON COLLEGE OF THE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherHARLAXTON COLLEGE OF THE UNIVERSITYWANDA MEMORIAL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · OtherWANDA MEMORIAL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INCFreedom Covenant Church: $19,000 · OtherFreedom Covenant ChurchHONORS COLLEGE: $17,000 · OtherHONORS COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYER: $9,000 · OtherOPTIONS NOW WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $8,667 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $8,000 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $8,000 · Other+17 more: $60,000 · Other+17 moreSHALOM MINISTRIES INC: $29,500 · ReligionSHALOM MINIST…CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 · ReligionCROWN FINANCI…PERCEPTION FUNDING INC: $1,500 · ReligionRIPON COLLEGE: $17,500 · EducationFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $8,000 · Human ServicesCARITAS INC: $5,667 · Human ServicesTHE RESTORE NETWORK: $1,000 · Human ServicesBELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · HealthCITY LIT THEATRE COMPANY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC: $5,500 · Community ImprovementMIDWEST CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$229,667Religion$39,000Education$17,500Human Services$14,667Health$13,000Arts & Culture$11,000Community Improvement$5,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHALOM MINISTRIES INC: $29,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS INC: $5,667 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPERCEPTION FUNDING INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RESTORE NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHALOM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY LIT THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds PERCEPTION FUNDING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESTORE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peak Benevolent Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peak Benevolent Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peak Benevolent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph