Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Peach Bowl Inc

PEACH BOWL INC.'s mission is to positively impact people's lives by celebrating college athletics through best-in-class events that create charitable donations, scholarships, economic impact, and memorable experiences.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$67MHealth$27MRecreation & Sports$18MArts & Culture$6.0MPhilanthropy$2.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MHuman Services$756kYouth Development$654kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $450k
  • $250k+4 grants · $11M
$20,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF GA ATHLETIC ASSOC INC$5,000,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$5,000,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$500,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FDN$421,528
PLAYER'S PHILANTHROPY FUND INC$150,000
GEORGIA'S LION LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$50,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
URBAN AND SHELLEY MEYER FAMILY FOUNDATION$32,500
KEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION$32,500
NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS$25,000
LORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY$22,500
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$22,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEGACIES ALIVE: $10k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%Lord Wedgwood Charity: $25k → 16%ANGEL ARMIES INC: $16k → 4%HOPE 139 HOUSE: $10k → 6%The Methodist Home of the South GA Con: $19k → 23%Bob Stoops Champions Foundation: $6k → 13%American Red Cross: $300k → 14%KEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION: $43k → 19%LORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY: $23k → 16%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%KEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION: $33k → 19%LORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY: $20k → 16%Love City Inc: $20k → 15%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%KEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION: $13k → 19%Lord Wedgwood Charity: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GEORGIA: $200k → 13%BEAMER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $23k → 16%LORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY: $10k → 16%Beamer Family Foundation: $18k → 16%American Red Cross of Georgia: $100k → 13%BEAMER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%BEAMER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND: $250k → 13%Angel Armies Inc: $10k → 13%ANDREW & WALTER YOUNG - YMCA: $250k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$85M · 53 repeat orgs$38M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
54

Total granted

$85M
$32M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+16%

Still filing today

83%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10M · revenue +38%
  • GT
    GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +113%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • AH
    ATLANTA HALL MANAGEMENT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $6.0M · revenue -52% · 27% of their budget
  • FS
    FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5.0M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
    one grant, 2023 · $4.5M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
2
University Foundation
—
3
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
4
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
7
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
10
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
11
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
12
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban and Shelley Meyer Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Construc…Youth Development ServicesChristian Youth CampsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%53%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/98
Grantees still filing
68/98
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $22,540,412 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA — $14,610,000 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMACLEMSON UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OREGON — $4,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $4,150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $3,250,000 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $2,882,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE — $2,850,000 · Other+28 more — $3,417,805 · OtherUniversity of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc — $10,000,000 · EducationUniversity of Georgia Athletic Assn I…GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $7,032,500 · EducationGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $4,455,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $4,300,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION I…AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,298,750 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $4,262,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONUniversity of Miami — $4,250,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami+27 more — $2,529,750 · Education+27 moreATLANTA HALL MANAGEMENT INC — $6,000,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $3,250,000 · Health+7 more — $133,000 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $259,150 · PhilanthropyTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $177,500 · PhilanthropyMULLEN FAMILY 36 FOUNDATION — $124,150 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $120,000 · PhilanthropyURBAN AND SHELLEY MEYER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $117,500 · PhilanthropyHBC FOUNDATION INC — $117,000 · PhilanthropyLions Clubs International Foundation — $100,000 · PhilanthropyDABO'S ALL IN TEAM FOUNDATION — $97,500 · Philanthropy+12 more — $516,550 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,300,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361) — $250,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesLORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY — $87,500 · Human ServicesKEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $87,500 · Human Services+7 more — $153,500 · Human ServicesBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc — $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $216,250 · Youth DevelopmentFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS — $36,250 · Youth DevelopmentChampions Off the Field — $32,500 · Youth Development+2 more — $27,500 · Youth Development
Other$68,200,717Education$41,128,500Arts & Culture$6,020,000Health$3,383,000Philanthropy$2,629,350Human Services$2,128,500Youth Development$812,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc — $10,000,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $7,032,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetATLANTA HALL MANAGEMENT INC — $6,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $4,455,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $4,300,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,298,750 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $4,262,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $4,250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $3,250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,090,300 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGeorgia Lions Lighthouse Foundation Inc — $755,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetATLANTA PARTNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION INC — $584,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWINSHAPE FOUNDATIONINC — $292,355 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $259,150 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361) — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC — $250,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $216,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $177,500 over 6y, 30% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $139,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULLEN FAMILY 36 FOUNDATION — $124,150 over 7y, 100% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN AND SHELLEY MEYER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $117,500 over 4y, 67% of budgetHBC FOUNDATION INC — $117,000 over 8y, 67% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $109,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $107,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY — $100,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDABO'S ALL IN TEAM FOUNDATION — $97,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetLORD WEDGWOOD CHARITY — $87,500 over 5y, 33% of budgetKEEP CLIMBING FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $87,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChickasaw Foundation — $75,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetAlma Foundation — $70,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAMER FAMILY FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 4y, 51% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL FOUNDATION INC — $61,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOMMY TUBERVILLE FOUNDATION — $60,750 over 5y, 68% of budgetHermas Readers Inc — $58,750 over 2y, 54% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $57,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER DEBERRY FOUNDATION — $57,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP — $51,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetChristian City Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundat…Athens Area Community…The Community Foundat…Bobby Dodd Coach of t…Chick-fil-A Foundatio…Southern Company Gas …Raymond James Charita…Triangle Community Fo…Enterprise Holdings F…Assurant FoundationFoundation for the Ca…Share Our Strength
Georgia Power Foundation IncGA17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Athens Area Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Bobby Dodd Coach of the Year Award Foundation · Chick-fil-A Foundation Inc · Southern Company Gas Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Share Our Strength

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peach Bowl Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines