Skip to content
Peacemakers International at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Peacemakers International

Mobilize christians: engage christians to contribute toward creating a compassionate and harmonious society.promote peace programs: implement initiatives that foster peace and harmony in various settings, including families, schools, workplaces, and communities.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$342kInternational$144kHuman Services$100kEducation$30k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $30,101, the rows itemized in this filing. The $39,553 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,452 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$25,101
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRY$25,101
GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FATHER'S HEART FOUNDATION INT: $6k → 8%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $20k → 10%Agape Christian Center: $34k → 14%Love 2020: $10k → 14%Agape Renewal Center: $149k → 14%GLEC: $7k → 10%AGAPE CHRISTIAN CENTER: $29k → 14%Agape Renewal Center: $88k → 14%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $6k → 10%AGAPE CHRISTIAN CENTER: $21k → 14%AGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRY: $29k → 14%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $5k → 10%Agape Christian Center: $17k → 14%AGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRY: $25k → 14%Friends of Grace: $10k → 10%Northwest Ascending Campaign: $10k → 14%Roads of Success ROD: $15k → 14%ROADS OF SUCCESS (ROD): $15k → 14%ROADS OF SUCCESS (ROD): $10k → 14%ROAD OF SUCCESS: $8k → 14%CENTER FOR MARKETPLACE MINIST: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$559k · 6 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$559k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-7%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    TOGETHER GLOBAL MISSIONS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $68k · revenue +20% · 33% of their budget
  • RO
    ROADS OF SUCCESS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +20%
  • MD
    MODERN DAY MISSIONS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • CR
    CULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GRACEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGNgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +109%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
4
G2G Center

Curriculum development and distribution & Christian Leadership Training

Religion
5
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
6
Christian Ministries International
—
7
Training & Resource Institute

Equip Christian workers with the biblical knowledge, Christian character, servant leadership, and ministry skills.

Religion
8
Silk Wave Mission

SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…

Religion
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Propagate Media Incorporaton

This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…

Religion
11
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
12
Global Mission Mobilization Initiative Inc

Promote and advance christian missionary

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Renewal Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Roads of Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRY: $290,910 · OtherAGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRYAGAPE CHRISTIAN CENTER: $99,987 · OtherAGAPE CHRISTIAN CENTERGLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $38,200 · OtherGLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER+1 more: $10,000 · OtherTOGETHER GLOBAL MISSIONS: $68,350 · InternationalTOGETHER GLO…ROADS OF SUCCESS: $48,200 · Arts & CultureCULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA: $15,000 · ReligionMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $13,050 · ReligionNORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $10,000 · ReligionCENTER FOR MARKETPLACE MINISTRIES DBA 3Q LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $5,750 · ReligionFRIENDS OF GRACE: $10,000 · HealthFATHERS HEART FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$439,097International$68,350Arts & Culture$48,200Religion$43,800Health$10,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAPE RENEWAL MINISTRY: $290,910 over 4y, 11% of budgetTOGETHER GLOBAL MISSIONS: $68,350 over 2y, 33% of budgetROADS OF SUCCESS: $48,200 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA: $15,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $13,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRACE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFATHERS HEART FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR MARKETPLACE MINISTRIES DBA 3Q LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $5,750 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peacemakers International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peacemakers International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peacemakers International?

    Find your warmest path to Peacemakers International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peacemakers International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home