Skip to content
PeaceHealth at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

PeaceHealth

We carry on the healing mission of jesus christ by promoting personal and community health, relieving pain and suffering, and treating each person in a loving and caring way.

$6.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
99
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.2MHuman Services$7.1MHousing & Shelter$4.5MEducation$4.1MReligion$2.5MFood & Nutrition$2.3MCommunity Improvement$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.5MOther$0
02FY2025 · 99 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 99 grants below total $6,726,520, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,905,881 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $179,361 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.4M
$25,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lane Community College$700,000
Opportunity Council$583,474
The 4th Dimension Recovery Ctr$425,000
St Vincent De Paul$401,772
Lower Columbia CAP$355,000
Western Lane Ambulance Dist$350,000
Everyone Village$295,000
Looking Glass Youth And Family$257,000
Southwest Washington Accountable Community of Health$200,000
YMCA$200,000
Friday Harbor Food Bank$156,000
Whatcom Council on Aging$152,500
The Oregon Community Foundation$150,000
United General District 304$136,000
Community Action of Skagit County$121,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $100k → 9%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY: $102k → 10%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $100k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SVCS: $73k → 15%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $47k → 9%JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RES CTR: $101k → 10%Lower Columbia Cap: $425k → 13%Catholic Community Svcs: $65k → 15%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $47k → 9%Lower Columbia CAP: $355k → 13%Ywca Clark County: $38k → 9%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE: $34k → 10%TOUTLE RIVER RANCH: $241k → 13%SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY: $32k → 10%Whatcom Council on Aging: $153k → 12%TOUTLE RIVER RANCH: $241k → 13%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $50k → 12%EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $107k → 13%Opportunity Council: $583k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $250k → 11%Community Action of Skagit County: $121k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $44k → 11%NW YOUTH SERVICES: $115k → 12%NW YOUTH SERVICES: $98k → 12%YWCA Bellingham: $60k → 12%BRIGID COLLINS FAMILY SUPPORT: $54k → 12%NW YOUTH SERVICES: $53k → 12%BRIGID COLLINS FAMILY SUPPORT: $53k → 12%Brigid Collins Family Support: $51k → 12%BRIGID COLLINS FAMILY SUPPORT: $51k → 12%NW YOUTH SERVICES: $40k → 12%NW YOUTH SERVICES: $38k → 12%Nw Youth Services: $38k → 12%Opportunity Council: $35k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $33k → 12%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $31k → 12%St Vincent De Paul: $402k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $293k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $274k → 15%Looking Glass Youth And Family: $257k → 15%LOOKING GLASS YOUTH AND FAMILY: $200k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $183k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $122k → 15%YMCA: $450k → 15%YMCA: $200k → 15%YMCA: $200k → 15%YMCA: $55k → 15%CARRY IT FORWARD: $35k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of PeaceHealth’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 87%.

PeaceHealthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 115 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

115 repeat relationships: 56 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

115
92

Total granted

$28M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+24%

Still filing today

76%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +15%
  • UC
    UNITY CARE NORTHWEST
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $931k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES OF SW WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • DY
    DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -14%
  • COLUMBIA RIVER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
2
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
3
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
4
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
5
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
6
Columbia Wellness

CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.

—
7
Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health
8
Collaborative Economic Development

To accelerate inclusive economic prosperity in lane county, oregon

Employment
9
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
10
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
11
Recovery Cafe Skagit

Provide a safe, healing, and restorative community that empowers long-term transformation through human connection for those recovering from the trauma of homelessness, addictions, and mental health challenges.

Education
12
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whatcom Council On Aging; the most unlike its peers is Ethnic Support Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

182 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 182 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
176/182
Grantees still filing
106/182
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS WESTERN US OFFICE FOR SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF PEACE: $2,665,111 · OtherST MARYS WESTERN US OFFICE FOR SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF…LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,487,042 · OtherLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGEWESTERN LANE AMBULANCE DISTRICT: $805,000 · OtherHOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY: $750,000 · OtherMERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST: $659,000 · Other+109 more: $8,982,640 · Other+109 moreST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $1,273,562 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $930,921 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSO…LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $815,080 · Human ServicesLOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY A…OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $715,474 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY COUNCILYouth and Family Link: $518,460 · Human ServicesYouth and Family LinkLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $467,000 · Human ServicesLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SE…COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $455,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT…NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $412,000 · Human ServicesJOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $344,008 · Human ServicesBRIGID COLLINS HOUSE: $315,075 · Human Services+21 more: $1,626,836 · Human Services+21 moreUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $1,111,350 · HealthUNITY CARE NORT…WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT: $500,000 · HealthWASHINGTON STAT…THE 4TH DIMENSION RECOVERY CENTER: $425,000 · HealthTHE 4TH DIMENSI…SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE: $400,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST WASHI…FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $373,500 · HealthFREE CLINIC OF …VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $287,135 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN M…DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES: $250,000 · HealthDAYBREAK YOUTH …COLUMBIA RIVER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $250,000 · HealthCOLUMBIA RIVER …Community Health Partners: $205,000 · Health+17 more: $856,974 · Health+17 moreTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF LANE COUNTY: $217,788 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WHATCOM COUNTY: $109,500 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation for SW Washington: $105,555 · PhilanthropyRECOVERY CAFE OF CLARK COUNTY: $80,000 · PhilanthropySAN JUAN ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $67,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $35,300 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $971,615 · Food & NutritionAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $269,715 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $86,000 · Food & NutritionCOUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $404,673 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERCARE: $302,500 · Housing & ShelterROAD2HOME: $168,000 · Housing & ShelterJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER: $90,600 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $687,500 · EducationCHOICE REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK: $150,000 · EducationCOMMON THREADS FARM: $70,000 · EducationOREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE: $37,500 · Education+6 more: $78,500 · Education
Other$16,348,793Human Services$7,873,916Health$4,658,959Philanthropy$1,665,643Food & Nutrition$1,327,330Housing & Shelter$1,045,773Education$1,023,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $1,273,562 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $1,111,350 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $971,615 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $930,921 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetLOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $815,080 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $715,474 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $687,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetMERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST: $659,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetYouth and Family Link: $518,460 over 4y, 16% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT: $500,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $467,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $455,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE 4TH DIMENSION RECOVERY CENTER: $425,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $412,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $404,673 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE: $400,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCHUCKANUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $398,000 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $373,500 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetJOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $344,008 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetBRIGID COLLINS HOUSE: $315,075 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSHELTERCARE: $302,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetEVERYONE CHURCH: $295,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $287,135 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $269,715 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES: $250,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY: $231,190 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LANE COUNTY: $217,788 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $209,575 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Health Partners: $205,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetEMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $187,500 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetNORTHWEST WASHINGTON INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $179,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetFRIDAY HARBOR FOOD BANK: $171,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetROAD2HOME: $168,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetWHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $167,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetWHATCOM ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACCESS C/O CHUCKANUT HEALTH FDN: $165,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWHATCOM CLUBHOUSE: $150,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHOICE REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK: $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLYDIA PLACE: $149,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF LANE COUNTY INC: $147,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Western Lane County: $144,600 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $139,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHIV ALLIANCE: $137,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE SEARCH AND RESCUE: $125,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetKetchikan Wellness Coalition: $123,275 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetWHATCOM FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $118,776 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WHATCOM COUNTY: $109,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY CARE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE ↗
  • Who funds LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds Youth and Family Link ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE 4TH DIMENSION RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CHUCKANUT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIGID COLLINS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERCARE ↗
  • Who funds EVERYONE CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whatcom Community Fou…North Sound Accountab…United Way of Lane Co…Chuckanut Health Foun…Chambers Family Found…The Oregon Community …Puget Sound Energy Fo…Mount Baker FoundationLane Community Health…Jerry H Walton Founda…The Firstenburg Found…Inatai Foundation
Whatcom Community FoundationWA66.3× affinity33 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whatcom Community Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · United Way of Lane County · Chuckanut Health Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mount Baker Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · Jerry H Walton Foundation · The Firstenburg Foundation · Inatai Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PeaceHealth funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PeaceHealth. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Lane County Medical Society: 100% of income from government
  • South Lane Family Nursery Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Hiv Alliance: 54% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc: 46% of income from government
  • United Way of Lane County: 31% of income from government
  • Looking Glass Community Services: 18% of income from government
  • Sheltercare: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Laurel Hill Center: 10% of income from government
  • School Garden Project of Lane County: 9% of income from government
  • Siuslaw Outreach Services: 8% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul Society of Lane County Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • South Lane Mental Health Services Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Columbia-Willamette: 1% of income from government
  • Parenting Now: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine Clinic: 0% of income from government
  • Willamette Community Health Solutions Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 253 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PeaceHealth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home