Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pcs Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MArts & Culture$312kYouth Development$43kInternational$16kAnimals$11kHealth$7kCrime & Legal$6kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$148k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACTION CHARITIES$5,000
SCHWARZMAN ANIMAL MEDICAL CTR$5,000
HARRISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,750
CROWDFUND PEER TO PEER$1,000
PETS ALIVE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HARRISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IN
RI
CA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 83% of Pcs Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Pcs Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 9 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
26

Total granted

$157k
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    Horace Mann School
    6× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +25%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA LLC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • RM
    RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST
    2× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +30%
  • RS
    ROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • SA
    SOUTH ASIA YOUTH ACTION CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
6
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
7
UChicago Research International

To engage in scientific research and educational activities throughout the world on behalf of and in conjunction with the university of chicago.

Health
8
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
9
Child Mind Medical Practice Pllc

Transforming the lives of children struggling with mental health & learning disorders.

Health
10
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
11
New York Law School

The mission of new york law school is to provide its students with knowledge, skills and ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,200,361 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN …ROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureROYAL SHAKESP…Individual grant recipient: $99,426 · OtherIndividual gr…SAYA: $21,500 · OtherSAYASOUTH ASIA YOUTH ACTION CHARITIES: $20,185 · OtherSOUTH ASIA YO…AMERICAN INDIAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · Other+19 more: $32,004 · Other+19 moreCHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA LLC: $10,000 · InternationalSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $2,500 · InternationalThe End Fund Inc: $2,000 · InternationalHorace Mann School: $12,750 · EducationLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC: $500 · EducationRUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST: $5,050 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK CITY CHILDRENS HOLIDAY PARTY INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · AnimalsPETS ALIVE INC: $2,250 · AnimalsBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,750 · AnimalsA NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $521 · Animals
Community Improvement$1,200,361Arts & Culture$200,000Other$190,115International$14,500Education$13,250Philanthropy$11,300Animals$9,521

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,200,361 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetHorace Mann School: $12,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA LLC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST: $5,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE ROOM WONDERS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETS ALIVE INC: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe End Fund Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARRISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $521 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pcs Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pcs Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pcs Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pcs Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pcs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph