Skip to content
PBHMC Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

PBHMC Inc

The pbhmc, inc.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$305kHealth$120kEmployment$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kHousing & Shelter$50kYouth Development$50kArts & Culture$49kRecreation & Sports$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEO FOUNDATION$50,000
MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELAINE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 4 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$345k
$496k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentHealthRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA
    3× · 2019–2022 · $140k · revenue +83%
  • MU
    Midwestern University
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +7%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • AB
    ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +22%
  • NP
    New Pathways For Youth
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -18%
  • WM
    WESTERN MARICOPA EDUCATION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
3
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
4
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
5
Arizona Center for Afterschool Excellence Inc

The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.

Education
6
Arizona Educational Foundation Inc

To celebrate excellence and cultivate opportunity in pk-12th grade arizona public education.

—
7
Arizona Head Start Association

The mission of the azhsa is to pursue excellence in collaboration with local agencies and partners that promote educational achievements, family self-sufficiency, and generational progress. to achieve this, we advocate for the wellbeing of…

Education
8
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
9
Arizona Association for the Education of Young Children

AzAEYC promotes high-quality early learning for all children, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy and research. We advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate and work on…

Education
10
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
11
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
12
Arizona Center for Community College Success

To bring arizona's community colleges together to share ideas, collaborate, and drive meaningful change. we act as a statewide hub providing colleges best practices, annual convenings, and professional development.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hands for Single Moms; the most unlike its peers is Elaine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA: $139,600 · OtherEDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONAARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INCWESTERN MARICOPA EDUCATION CENTER: $50,000 · OtherWESTERN MARICOPA EDUCATION CENTERSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $50,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATEDGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $49,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INCCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · OtherCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INCHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $40,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMSTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $20,000 · OtherMidwestern University: $85,000 · EducationMidwestern UniversityLEO FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationLEO FOUNDATIONNew Pathways For Youth: $50,000 · Crime & LegalFIESTA EVENTS INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsArizona Career Pathways: $50,000 · EmploymentElaine: $50,000 · Human ServicesPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $42,000 · Youth Development
Other$433,600Education$165,000Crime & Legal$50,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Employment$50,000Human Services$50,000Youth Development$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA: $139,600 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMidwestern University: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEO FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFIESTA EVENTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetArizona Career Pathways: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElaine: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $42,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $40,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BHHS Legacy FoundationArizona Community Fou…The Foundation for Co…Valley of the Sun Uni…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…Virginia G Piper Char…John F Long Foundatio…Thunderbirds CharitiesCommunity Foundation …Ibis Foundation of Ar…Garcia Family Foundat…Mercy Care
BHHS Legacy FoundationAZ30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BHHS Legacy Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Valley of the Sun United Way · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · John F Long Foundation Inc · Thunderbirds Charities · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC · Garcia Family Foundation · Mercy Care

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PBHMC Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PBHMC Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to PBHMC Inc?

    Find your warmest path to PBHMC Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on PBHMC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home