Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pazahanick Charitable Giving

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6kFood & Nutrition$3kYouth Development$2kInternational$2kCrime & Legal$1kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$800Public Safety & Disaster$781Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$104
Median grant
1
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KLEIN CAIN BAND ASSOCIATION$104
THE 100 CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGE OF PROMISE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$8k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+1%

Still filing today

67%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalPhilanthropyReligionHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Houston Food Bank
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +107%
  • MC
    Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $1k · revenue +130%
  • T1
    THE 100 CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $781 · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dup 15Q Alliance

Dup15q alliance empowers individuals living with dup15q syndrome and other related rare diseases to reach their full potential by advancing breakthrough research and life-changing therapeutic treatments, supporting families affected by…

Health
2
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
8
Zero to Three National Center for Infants Toddlers and Families

At zero to three we provide parents, professionals, and policymakers the knowledge and know-how to nurture early development. we envision a society that has the knowledge and will to support all infants and toddlers in reaching their full…

Human Services
9
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
10
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Caleb Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank: $2,600 · OtherThe Houston Food BankTHE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $2,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUNSET YOUTH: $1,522 · OtherSUNSET YOUTHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $1,440 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+14 more: $2,907 · Other+14 moreMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $1,100 · Crime & LegalMontgomer…THE 100 CLUB INC: $781 · Crime & LegalTHE 100 C…World Help: $1,500 · ReligionBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $970 · HealthGIRLSTART: $808 · Recreation & SportsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $600 · PhilanthropyCALEB FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyBRIDGE OF PROMISE: $500 · Human Services
Other$17,069Crime & Legal$1,881Religion$1,500Health$970Recreation & Sports$808Philanthropy$700Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Help: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLSTART: $808 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $781 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF PROMISE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKLEIN CAIN BAND ASSOCIATION: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds World Help ↗
  • Who funds Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KLEIN CAIN BAND ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CALEB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pazahanick Charitable Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pazahanick Charitable Giving. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pazahanick Charitable Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph