Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paz De Corazon

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$939k
Granted FY2023
26
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of Paz De Corazon’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 26 grants below total $723,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $939,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $216,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $413k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Driscoll Childrens Hospital$50,000
Coastal Bend Food Bank$50,000
CASA of the Coastal Bend$50,000
Brighton Center$50,000
The Center for Refugee Services$50,000
YWCA$50,000
The Rise School of Corpus Christi$30,000
Del Mar College Foundation$27,000
Focus Foundation$26,000
Boysville, Inc$25,000
Triumph Over Kid Cancer Foundation (TOKC)$25,000
Cenikor Foundation of Corpus Christi (Formerly Charlies Place)$25,000
Wesley Community Center$25,000
Coastal Bend Food Bank$25,000
San Antonio Food Bank$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$991k · 16 repeat orgs$449k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$991k
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+36%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Human ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Center for Refugee Services
    2× · 2022–2023 · $102k · revenue +36%
  • CB
    COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +10%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • FV
    Family Violence & Prevention Services
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • ME
    Metro E. School of Design
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • SF
    San Fran Community Center
    one grant, 2022 · $28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
2
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
3
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
6
Children's Alliance of South Texas

To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
8
Childrens Advocacy Center of Hidalgo County Inc

The childrens advocacy center of hidalgo county, inc. provides services to abused children. services include on-site referrals for medical services. the organization follows up with authorities on efforts against the perpetrators of the…

Crime & Legal
9
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
10
Children's Advocacy Center of the South Plains

To bring together community resources to speed the healing of child victims of abuse and trauma.

Crime & Legal
11
Community Action Corporation of South Texas

To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.

Human Services
12
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corpus Christi Metro Ministriesinc and the most unlike its peers is Focus Foundation-for Our Childrens Ultimate Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%46%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr10%51%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,781

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YWCA — $100,000 · OtherYWCATriumph Over Kid Cancer Foundation (TOKC) — $85,000 · OtherTriumph Over Kid Cancer Foundation (TOKC)Family Violence & Prevention Services — $50,000 · OtherFamily Violence & Prevention ServicesSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $50,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INCWesley Community Center — $50,000 · OtherWesley Community CenterSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $50,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKCenikor Foundation of Corpus Christi (Formerly Charlies Place) — $40,000 · OtherCenikor Foundation of Corpus Christi (Formerl…Metro E. School of Design — $28,000 · OtherSan Fran Community Center — $28,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $25,000 · OtherJewish Family Services — $25,000 · OtherArK Assessment Center — $25,000 · OtherHolocaust Memorial Museum (Jewish Federation of San Antonio) — $25,000 · Other+3 more — $40,000 · Other+3 moreCenter for Refugee Services — $101,744 · Human ServicesCenter for Refugee …FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE — $50,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSELING S…CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCORPUS CHRISTI METR…BOYSVILLE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesBOYSVILLE INCFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PRE…BLACK OUTSIDE INC — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesRISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI — $80,000 · EducationRISE SCHOOL …BRIGHTON CENTER — $75,000 · EducationBRIGHTON CEN…TEXAS A&M-CORPUS CHRISTI FOUNDATION — $14,000 · EducationTEXAS A&M-CO…COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL BE…DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 · PhilanthropyDEL MAR CO…DKMS — $50,000 · HealthDriscoll Children's Hospital — $50,000 · HealthAMISTAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 · HealthCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $100,000 · Food & NutritionCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C — $75,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO — $15,000 · Civil RightsFOCUS FOUNDATION-FOR OUR CHILDRENS ULTIMATE SUCCESS — $26,000 · Youth Development
Other$621,000Human Services$266,744Education$169,000Philanthropy$147,000Health$120,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Civil Rights$90,000Youth Development$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCenter for Refugee Services — $101,744 over 2y, 13% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI — $80,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C — $75,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER — $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDKMS — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOCUS FOUNDATION-FOR OUR CHILDRENS ULTIMATE SUCCESS — $26,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMISTAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS A&M-CORPUS CHRISTI FOUNDATION — $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK OUTSIDE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puente de Maravillas FoundationTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puente de Maravillas Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Tres Grace Family Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.4M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph