Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paulson Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$195kEnvironment$85kInternational$82kHealth$58kArts & Culture$28kHuman Services$15kPublic Benefit$8kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$557k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALISADES VILLAGE$5,000
AMERICAN CLIMATE PARTNERS$5,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$5,000
SCHOHARIE LAND TRUST$5,000
LYON RANCH THERAPY ANIMALS$5,000
VIRGINIA VOICE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
APOPO$5,000
ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
4 PAWS FOR ABILITY$5,000
SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB$5,000
LIFETIME WELLS VISION$5,000
THE ARTS CTR IN ORANGE$5,000
WOMEN'S WORLD BANKING INC$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%Virginia Voice: $2k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%VIRGINIA VOICE: $2k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%Charity Navigator: $200 → 7%VIRGINIA VOICE: $2k → 9%4 Paws for Ability: $4k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%VIRGINIA VOICE: $2k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%Virginia Voice: $2k → 9%4 Paws for Ability: $4k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $400 → 7%VIRGINIA VOICE: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $400 → 7%VIRGINIA VOICE: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%VIRGINIA VOICE: $2k → 9%PALISADES VILLAGE: $5k → 14%Palisades Villiage: $2k → 14%Palisades Villiage: $2k → 14%PALISADES VILLAGE: $2k → 14%PALISADES VILLAGE: $2k → 14%PALISADES VILLAGE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$460k · 21 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$460k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
0%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +36%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +54%
  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • LW
    LIFETIME WELLS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
8
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
9
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
10
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
11
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
12
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lifetime Wells Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $46,000 · OtherORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONA…LYON RANCH THERAPY ANIMALS: $21,000 · OtherLYON RANCH THERAPY ANIMALSCURE CHILDHOOD CANCER: $14,000 · OtherCURE CHILDHOOD CANCERORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 · OtherORBIS INTERNATIONALAFGHAN ED FOR A BETTER TOMO: $8,000 · OtherAFGHAN ED FOR A BETTER TOMOIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherAPOPO: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN CLIMATE PARTNERS: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN CLIMATE PARTNERSLIFETIME WELLS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $4,500 · OtherAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUND…THE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsTHE INTERNATIONAL RHIN…SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $20,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB …WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $6,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION …+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsRAINFOREST TRUST: $35,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTWOMEN'S WORLD BANKING INC: $34,000 · InternationalWOMEN'S WORLD BANK…LIFETIME WELLS VISION INC: $12,000 · InternationalLIFETIME WELLS VIS…4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $32,500 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILI…Virginia Voice Inc: $22,000 · Human ServicesVirginia Voice I…Palisades Village: $15,000 · Human ServicesPalisades Villag…Charity Navigator: $3,100 · Human ServicesMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $17,500 · HealthMIDWIVES …Cure Childhood Cancer Inc: $16,000 · HealthCure Chil…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · HealthCANCER RE…UNITE FOR SIGHT INC: $2,000 · HealthARTS CENTER IN ORANGE INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOHARIE LAND TRUST INC: $25,000 · Environment
Other$145,500Animals$95,000International$81,000Human Services$72,600Health$39,500Arts & Culture$28,000Environment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $46,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $35,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S WORLD BANKING INC: $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARTS CENTER IN ORANGE INC: $28,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOHARIE LAND TRUST INC: $25,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN CLIMATE PARTNERS: $25,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetVirginia Voice Inc: $22,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPalisades Village: $15,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLIFETIME WELLS VISION INC: $12,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFETIME WELLS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $3,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITE FOR SIGHT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S WORLD BANKING INC ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER IN ORANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOHARIE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CLIMATE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Voice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds Palisades Village ↗
  • Who funds LIFETIME WELLS VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFETIME WELLS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds UNITE FOR SIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paulson Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paulson Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paulson Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Paulson Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paulson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph