Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$107kEducation$80kReligion$30kYouth Development$21kRecreation & Sports$21kHousing & Shelter$18kPhilanthropy$16kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
OLD FORT CHURCH$5,000
SENECA COUNTY COUNCIL ON HOMELESS$4,000
FACT$3,000
TIFFIN CITY SCHOOLS$2,750
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CSJI -TIFFIN INC$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
WOMEN HELPING YOUNG MOTHERS$2,000
CASA OF SENECA SANDUSKY$1,500
SISTERS IN SHELTER$1,500
OLD FORT ELEMENTARY PTO$1,000
TILLY CHRISTMAN FOR KIDS$1,000
TIFFIN SENECA HERITAGE FESTIVAL$1,000
HAROLD J FRALEY FOP 128$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST FRANCIS HOME: $5k → 12%SISTERS IN SHELTER: $4k → 12%TIFFIN SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER: $3k → 12%SISTERS IN SHELTER: $3k → 12%STEIN HOSPICE SERVICES: $2k → 12%SISTERS IN SHELTER: $2k → 12%SISTERS IN SHELTER: $2k → 12%SISTERS IN SHELTER: $2k → 12%TIFFIN SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$349k · 40 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
40

Total granted

$349k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+28%

Still filing today

25%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    Heidelberg University
    5× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • TU
    Tiffin University
    5× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SANDUSKY COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TC
    TERRA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue -3%
  • HP
    HAYES PRESIDENTIAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • OF
    OLD FORT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Seneca Industrial & Economic Development Corp

To improve the economic well-being and quality of life for tiffin and seneca county, ohio, by leading, promoting, and facilitating positive economic, community and downtown development.

—
3
Seneca Health Services Inc

To be the leading provider of behavioral and physical healthcare through compassionate and quality services in our community.

—
4
Seneca Housing Inc

Assist low income people in achieving housing

Housing & Shelter
5
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
6
Seneca Regional Chamber of Commerce & Visitor Services

To be the most influential and respected association of business professionals in Northwest Ohio shaping a positive business environment that promotes the exchange of goods and services to make a profit.

—
7
St Francis Home of Saginaw

Skilled nursing care for the elderly.

—
8
Hospice of Tuscarawas County Inc

The mission of community hospice is to honor life by providing peace, hope, and compassion to those we serve. this is done by providing professional medical care and also numerous therapies, counseling, & spiritual guidance for our…

Human Services
9
Society for Handicapped Citizens of Medina County Inc

To provide residential care and services to handicapped citizens of northern ohio.

—
10
Seneca County Council On Homelessness Inc

Homeless shelter

Human Services
11
Hospice of Northwest Ohio

Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan

—
12
United Way of Henry County

To receive and accept property to be administered exclusively for charitable purposes for the benefit of the people in the henry county, ohio area

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Csji-Tiffin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seneca County Honor Bus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST CALL FOR HELP: $25,000 · OtherFIRST CALL FOR HELPIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOMEN HELPING YOUNG MOTHERS INC: $18,500 · OtherOLD FORT CHURCH: $18,500 · OtherBLACK SWAMP AREA BOY SCOUTS: $15,000 · OtherTIFFIN SENECA UNITED WAY INC: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherTERRA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Other+63 more: $190,860 · Other+63 moreHeidelberg University: $20,000 · EducationHeidelberg …Tiffin University: $17,000 · EducationTiffin Univ…FOSTORIA LEARNING CENTER: $5,500 · EducationFOSTORIA LE…SISTERS IN SHELTER: $10,500 · Human ServicesST FRANCIS HOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTIFFIN-SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSTEIN HOSPICE SERVICE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOUSING OHIO INC: $1,000 · HealthThe Stemtown Historical Society: $809 · Arts & CultureFRANCISCAN EARTH LITERACY CENTER: $500 · ReligionTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY: $500 · AnimalsSENECA COUNTY HONOR BUS: $300 · Public Benefit
Other$359,360Education$42,500Human Services$21,500Health$1,000Arts & Culture$809Religion$500Animals$500Public Benefit$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeidelberg University: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIFFIN SENECA UNITED WAY INC: $14,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTERRA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCSJI-TIFFIN INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERS IN SHELTER: $10,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SANDUSKY COUNTY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTORIA LEARNING CENTER: $5,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST FRANCIS HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIFFIN-SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSENECA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $2,360 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTEIN HOSPICE SERVICE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPICE CARE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOUSING OHIO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Stemtown Historical Society: $809 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN EARTH LITERACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSENECA COUNTY HONOR BUS: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
  • Who funds Tiffin University ↗
  • Who funds TIFFIN SENECA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CSJI-TIFFIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS IN SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SANDUSKY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FOSTORIA LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFFIN-SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SENECA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Machinery Foundation IncOH36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Machinery Foundation Inc · Cole Family Foundation · Meshech Frost Tr Uw Charitable · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Seneca Industrial & Economic Development Corp · Premier Bank Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Webster Foundation Inc · Knight-Baldwin Charitable Fund Inc · The Twenty First Century Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph