· Public charity
Seneca Industrial & Economic Development Corp
To improve the economic well-being and quality of life for tiffin and seneca county, ohio, by leading, promoting, and facilitating positive economic, community and downtown development.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $6,592 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,478 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,886 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPERATION HALLMARK INC | $6,592 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center's objective is to provide senior citizens of the troy ohio area with activities and fellowship.
The lodge unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. this is accomplished thru a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for members
To provide seniors meals & recreational activities
Museum
Historical society for fredericktown ohio
Promote indian culture & contribute for growth
To provide social & recreational activities for veterans
To collect and preserve any and all historic materials books artifacts machinery etc.
Unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, and charity. It is accomplished through a year round schedule of recreational & social actvities for the members and their families
The Organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Seneca Sandusky & Wyandot Counties and the most unlike its peers is Sisters in Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOSTORIA MOOSE LODGE FOSTORIA MOOSE LODGE ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SENECA SANDUSKY & WYANDOT COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE USA NORTHWEST OH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds TIFFIN-SENECA CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Tiffin Loyal Order of Moose Lodge NO 846 ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN EARTH LITERACY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Machinery Foundation Inc · Meshech Frost Tr Uw Charitable · Paul M & Lucy J Gillmor Charitable Foundation · Tiffin Seneca United Way Inc · Cole Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seneca Industrial & Economic Development Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.