Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul J McCann Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$708k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$298k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.7MEducation$1.0MHealth$970kCrime & Legal$218kReligion$144kHousing & Shelter$87kPhilanthropy$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $245k
  • $250k+1 grant · $298k
$40,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS$298,000
AWARE INC$75,000
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$60,000
LAS CRUCES CATHOLIC SCHOOL$60,000
MONTANA STATE HOSPITAL$50,000
RESTORATIVE PARTNER$40,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SCHOOL$40,000
MESILLA VALLEY PREGNANCY RESOURCE$25,000
ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREAT FALLS$20,000
WESTERN MT REGIONAL COMMUNITY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $7k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
MD
NM
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 17 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
22

Total granted

$4.1M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

29%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AWARE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $500k · revenue +62%
  • RP
    RESTORATIVE PARTNERS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $213k · revenue +25%
  • MV
    MESILLA VALLEY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • WL
    WHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue +219%
  • WM
    WESTERN MONTANA REGIONAL COMM HEALT
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Southwest Wyoming Pregnancy Resource Ctr Inside Connection

Pregnancy resource services

Human Services
3
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
4
Wyoming Health Resources Network Inc

To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.

Health
5
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
6
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
7
Northwest Wyoming Family Planning Inc

Northwest wyoming family planning is a private, non-profit organization that exists to provide comprehensive, quality voluntary family planning, educational outreach, and other reproductive health and wellness services.

Human Services
8
Western Wyoming Family Planning Inc

We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.

Health
9
Wyoming Women's Business Center

The wyoming women's business center strives to advance self-sufficiency by promoting economic justice and equality throughout wyoming. to achieve the mission, the wwbc provides services that foster the creation and expansion of small…

Community Improvement
10
Onslow Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Pregnancy and abortion related issues

Human Services
11
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
12
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aware Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Dawson County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS: $1,730,807 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONSAWARE INC: $500,000 · OtherAWARE INCLAS CRUCES CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $382,000 · OtherLAS CRUCES CATHOLIC SCHOOLMONTANA STATE HOSPITAL: $340,000 · OtherMONTANA STATE HOSPITALALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $330,000 · OtherALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOLSLOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SCHOOL: $220,000 · OtherLOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SCHOOL+27 more: $469,000 · Other+27 moreRESTORATIVE PARTNERS INC: $213,000 · Crime & LegalMESILLA VALLEY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 · HealthWHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC: $22,000 · EnvironmentETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $20,000 · ReligionNORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $12,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$3,971,807Crime & Legal$213,000Health$100,000Environment$22,000Religion$20,000Human Services$12,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAWARE INC: $500,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRESTORATIVE PARTNERS INC: $213,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetMESILLA VALLEY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetWHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC: $22,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATIVE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MESILLA VALLEY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DAWSON COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul J McCann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul J McCann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul J McCann Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Paul J McCann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul J McCann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph