Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$292k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$312kReligion$260kYouth Development$130kArts & Culture$79kHousing & Shelter$58kHuman Services$52kCommunity Improvement$45kHealth$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $167k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$167,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN NORTHCENTRA$30,000
BRIDGE STREET MISSION CAPITAL$20,000
WISCONSIN DENTAL ASSOC MISSION OF MERC$20,000
WAUSAU MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$20,000
THE NEIGHBORS PLACE$5,000
HAGAR HOUSE$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$5,000
UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WISCONSIN AUTOMOTIVE & TRUST EDUCATION$2,600
ALL STARS UNDER THE STARS$2,500
CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY$2,000
NORTHCENTRAL WISCONSIN MASTER GARDENER$1,600
LEAP LAW ENFORCEMENT APPRECIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%NEW BEGINNINGS FOR REFUGEES: $12k → 11%HAGAR HOUSE: $9k → 11%HAGAR HOUSE: $6k → 11%HAGAR HOUSE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$800k · 24 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
22

Total granted

$800k
$263k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WAUSAU AREA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +37%
  • CI
    CHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +3%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAINT MICHAELS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL PARISH
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CLASSICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $41k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Wisconsin Inc

To create and support one-on-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
2
Community Shares of Wisconsin Inc

Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.

—
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northcentral Wisconsin Inc

The mission of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northcentral Wisconsin is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
4
Christian Community Child Center Inc

We believe that all children are special & unique. Our goal is to create a safe, loving environment where children can learn & be nurtured. We offer children 6 wks to 10 yrs a program emphasizing a child's total development: physical,…

Human Services
5
Women and Children's Horizons Inc

The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.

Human Services
6
Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc

To advocate for progressive change in the wisconsin justice system by educating the public about its real-life impacts and partnering with other organizations to achieve more just outcomes.

Crime & Legal
7
Food Pantry of Waukesha County Inc

The food pantry serving waukesha county provides food, hope, and dignity to county residents in need, and advocates to increase awareness of hunger through community partnerships.

—
8
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

—
9
Compass Wisconsin Inc

To see everyone, everywhere, faithfully living by god's financial principles.

Human Services
10
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Child Advocacy Centers of Wisconsin

Establish and maintain child advocacy centers and teams in wisconsin.

Human Services
12
Milwaukee Center for Children and Youth Inc

To end suffering of abused children in milwaukee county through comprehensive advocacy, education, and supportive services that heal trauma, build resilience, nurture the ability to thrive, and create a path toward eradicating the epidemic…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison; the most unlike its peers is Christmas in July Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $234,625 · OtherNEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLSST MICHAEL CONGREGATION: $115,000 · OtherST MICHAEL CONGREGATIONSAINT MICHAELS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherSAINT MICHAELS CATHOLIC CHURCHST MICHAEL PARISH: $60,000 · OtherST MICHAEL PARISHBRIDGE STREET MISSION CAPITAL: $45,000 · OtherBRIDGE STREET MISSION CAPITALSACRED HEART CLASSICAL SCHOOL: $41,050 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN NORTHCENTRA: $30,000 · Other+32 more: $206,886 · Other+32 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WAUSAU AREA INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…CHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC: $45,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $9,525 · Arts & CultureMARATHON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC: $57,500 · Public BenefitTHE HAGAR HOUSE INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesNEW BEGINNINGS FOR REFUGEES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $7,250 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $22,670 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $9,500 · PhilanthropyOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $20,000 · Employment
Other$807,561Youth Development$110,000Arts & Culture$58,025Public Benefit$57,500Human Services$38,750Philanthropy$32,170Employment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WAUSAU AREA INC: $110,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC: $57,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC: $45,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $22,670 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HAGAR HOUSE INC: $19,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $18,286 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS FOR REFUGEES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetIRONBULL INC: $11,200 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetWISCONSIN AUTOMOTIVE AND TRUCK EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,600 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $9,525 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAPTOR EDUCATION GROUP INC: $8,525 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $7,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARATHON COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $5,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $5,275 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMARATHON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WAUSAU AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAGAR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS FOR REFUGEES INC ↗
  • Who funds IRONBULL INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN AUTOMOTIVE AND TRUCK EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPTOR EDUCATION GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds MARATHON COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARATHON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ba & Esther Greenheck FoundationWI36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Dudley Foundation Inc · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Judd S Alexander Foundation · Abbybank Foundation Inc · Dan Storey Foundation Inc · Walter Alexander Foundation Inc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · The Macdonald Foundation · Dwight and Linda Davis Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy?

    Find your warmest path to Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph