Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dan Storey Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$80kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$26kEnvironment$25kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$7kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$940k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONK BOTANICAL GARDENS$8,300
CHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM$7,500
PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
GOOD NEWS PROJECT INC$3,000
LEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM$2,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN - NORTHCENTRAL WISCONSIN$1,500
UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY$1,000
WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND SERVICE$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN$500
KIDS VOTING USA OF MARATHON COUNTY INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HAGAR HOUSE INCORPORATED: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$192k · 15 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$192k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+21%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +582%
  • WY
    WOODSON YMCA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +93%
  • LY
    LEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HAGAR HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • GW
    GREATER WAUSAU PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP L PARTNERSHIP LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -482%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wausaukee Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

3
Rock River Repertory Theatre

Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.

Arts & Culture
4
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
5
West Wisconsin Land Trust Inc

The mission of the west wisconsin land trust, inc. is to preserve western wisconsin's natural character by informing, facilitating, and partnering with private landowners, communities, and local governments to protect valuable land.

6
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
7
Markesan Historical Society
8
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
9
Wisconsin Housing Preservation Corp

Whpc acquires, preserves and develops low-income and affordable housing in wisconsin. the majority of the housing is subsidized through the u.s. department of housing and urban development, u.s.d.a. rural development, federal and state…

Housing & Shelter
10
Center for the Visual Arts

Center for the visual arts (cva) in downtown wausau enhances the vitality and vibrancy of the community, offering art classes, gallery space for exhibits, and community programs. not for profit art centers like the cva, provide exhibit…

Arts & Culture
11
Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin

Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin is a nonprofit educational organization whose primary purpose is to inspire and educate youth through hands-on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs focused on aviation. The…

Education
12
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners Campus Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONK BOTANICAL GARDENS — $25,000 · OtherMONK BOTANICAL GARDENSWOODSON YMCA INC — $22,000 · OtherWOODSON YMCA INCLEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM INC — $20,000 · OtherLEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM INCIndividual grant recipient — $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN - CENTRAL WI — $10,000 · OtherMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN - CENTRAL WIJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT — $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherGREATER WAUSAU PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP L PARTNERSHIP LTD — $5,000 · Other+13 more — $24,200 · Other+13 morePERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION…CHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC — $7,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC+3 more — $3,550 · Arts & Culture+3 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC — $22,500 · Public BenefitCOMMUNITY …UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $8,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $6,500 · PhilanthropyTHE HAGAR HOUSE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEWS PROJECT INC — $3,000 · InternationalBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED — $2,400 · Youth Development
Other$135,200Arts & Culture$56,050Public Benefit$22,500Philanthropy$14,500Human Services$5,000International$3,000Youth Development$2,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWOODSON YMCA INC — $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAGAR HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER WAUSAU PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP L PARTNERSHIP LTD — $5,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetGOOD NEWS PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAUSAU AND MARATHON COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 70% of budgetTHE WAUSAU CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIRONBULL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARATHON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWausau Lyric Choir Inc — $750 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ba & Esther Greenheck FoundationWI36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Dudley Foundation Inc · Dwight and Linda Davis Foundation · Judd S Alexander Foundation · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Paul & Ruth Schultz Fdn Agy · Victor & Helen Geisel Foundation · The Macdonald Foundation · Abbybank Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dan Storey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dan Storey Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dan Storey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph