Skip to content
Paul and Patricia Taylor Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Paul and Patricia Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$743k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$743k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Philanthropy$743kHealth$191kYouth Development$82kArts & Culture$73kAnimals$68kHuman Services$47kInternational$30kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$742,914
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$742,914
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $10k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $10k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
OH
CA
MO
KY
VA
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$396k · 17 repeat orgs$869k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$396k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+32%

Still filing today

59%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $743k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +69%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    2× · 2020–2021 · $38k · revenue +47%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES NORTHSTAR YOUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • NS
    NORTH STAR YOUTH PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • 4C
    4522 CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
6
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
7
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
10
American Society of Anesthesiologists

Advancing the practice and securing the future of anesthesiology through medical education, creation and dissemination of new knowledge, improvement of patient care, and legislative and regulatory advocacy.

—
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bayganda Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $742,914 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES NORTHSTAR YOUTH: $40,000 · OtherNORTH STAR YOUTH PARTNERSHIP: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $174,000 · Other+13 moreTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $75,000 · HealthTHE FOUND…4522 CLUB: $20,000 · Health4522 CLUBALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…ALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $42,900 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $37,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $30,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 · InternationalREADY READERS: $4,500 · EducationBAYGANDA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$996,914Health$101,000Arts & Culture$57,900Animals$37,500Human Services$30,000International$30,000Education$6,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $42,900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $37,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget4522 CLUB: $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Patricia Taylor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Patricia Taylor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul and Patricia Taylor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home