Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul and Lisa Deangelo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$239kHealth$149kPhilanthropy$47kEducation$41kYouth Development$37kHuman Services$36kArts & Culture$36kCommunity Improvement$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Carey Family Foundation$15,000
Curing Kids Cancer$12,500
Individual grant recipient$11,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,500
Valley East Little League$5,000
Valley East Little League$5,000
Banks Township Babe Ruth$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Tri County Little League of McAdoo$5,000
McKenzie Promising Futures Fund$5,000
THE JUMPSTART CART$5,000
Disabled American Veterans$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
570 FOR THE YOUTH FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $550 → 14%Curing Kids Cancer: $25k → 8%Curing Kids Cancer: $10k → 8%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%Curing Kids Cancer: $13k → 8%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT: $5k → 15%United Charities: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
CT
MD
DE
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$539k · 31 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
41

Total granted

$539k
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+32%

Still filing today

29%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Collaborative Autism Movement LLC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +17% · 35% of their budget
  • CK
    Curing Kids Cancer Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +8%
  • VW
    VALLEY WEST LITTLE LEAGUE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • LL
    LITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -50% · 26% of their budget
  • H
    HARP
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
5
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
6
Carson Leslie Foundation

To raise funds for research leading to a cure for pediatric cancer and enrich the lives of teens in the battle.

Health
7
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc

The Childrens Cancer Foundation, Inc. (Organization) is a charitable, not-for-profit corporation committed to funding locally-based researchers, programs and facilities until every child is assured a healthy cancer free future. The…

—
8
Avery Coonley School

The Avery Coonley School elevates high-achieving and gifted learners through immersion in a mutually talented community where intellect, curiosity, and creativity are enhanced by optimal challenge.

—
9
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
10
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
11
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
12
Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute Inc

The NCHRI directly supports the NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ("NCH") mission to provide hope through advanced care for our children and families. (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carey Family Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carey Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMCKENZIE PROMISING FUTURES FUND INC: $35,000 · OtherMCKENZIE PROMISING FUTURES FUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherValley East Little League: $25,000 · OtherHazleton Little League: $22,500 · Other+61 more: $303,719 · Other+61 moreCollaborative Autism Movement LLC: $50,000 · HealthCollaborativ…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,500 · HealthAMERICAN CAN…JOVANTE WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthJOVANTE WOOD…LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL: $5,000 · HealthCuring Kids Cancer Inc: $47,500 · Human ServicesJASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,550 · Human ServicesCarey Family Foundation: $45,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHAZLETON AREA RECREATION PROGRAM: $19,600 · Recreation & SportsCAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $1,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$612,219Health$98,000Human Services$59,050Philanthropy$45,000Recreation & Sports$39,600Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCollaborative Autism Movement LLC: $50,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetCuring Kids Cancer Inc: $47,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCarey Family Foundation: $45,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetVALLEY WEST LITTLE LEAGUE: $10,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetJOVANTE WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER HAZLETON COMMUNITY AREA NEW DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH PREP: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEGANCE AT HERSHEY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCrossroads Center for Children: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OJMCDUFFIE CATCH 81 FOUND INC: $500 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Collaborative Autism Movement LLC ↗
  • Who funds Curing Kids Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds Carey Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HAZLETON AREA RECREATION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY WEST LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JOVANTE WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HAZLETON COMMUNITY AREA NEW DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Federal Charitable FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Federal Charitable Foundation · Ppl Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Lisa Deangelo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Lisa Deangelo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Children's Beach House Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul and Lisa Deangelo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph