Skip to content
Paul and Dina W Block Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Paul and Dina W Block Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$300kEducation$220kHuman Services$68kCommunity Improvement$60kHealth$52kCivil Rights$45kPublic Benefit$44kMembership Benefit$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 99% of reported assets are held in Pnc.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITERACY PITTSBURGH$30,000
PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER$30,000
JEREMIAH'S PLACE$30,000
WOODLAWN CEMETARY$20,000
MOM'S HOUSE$13,000
THE GROLIER CLUB$13,000
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
TOLEDO SYMPHONY$7,500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO$6,000
READ FOR LITERACY$4,000
CHAMBER MUSIC PITTSBURGH$3,000
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY$2,500
PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE$2,000
PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE SEEING EYE: $5k → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $2k → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $2k → 4%JEREMIAH'S PLACE: $30k → 11%MOM'S HOUSE: $13k → 18%SISTER PGH: $2k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$668k · 25 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
24

Total granted

$668k
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

68%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $169k · revenue +97%
  • LP
    LITERACY PITTSBURGH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $141k · revenue +68%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KENSICO CEMETERY
    one grant, 2023 · $34k · revenue +20%
  • CC
    CANCER CARE ALLIANCE FDN
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledograduated
    one grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
3
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
4
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
5
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
7
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
8
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
9
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
10
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
11
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
12
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Animal Rescue; the most unlike its peers is Riverbend Equine Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOLEDO SYMPHONY: $37,500 · OtherTOLEDO SYMPHONYTHE KENSICO CEMETERY: $34,000 · OtherTHE KENSICO CEMETERYTHE GROLIER CLUB: $30,500 · OtherTHE GROLIER CLUBCANCER CARE ALLIANCE FDN: $24,000 · OtherCANCER CARE ALLIANCE FDNYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo: $22,000 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association of Grea…MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYWOODLAWN CEMETARY: $20,000 · OtherWOODLAWN CEMETARYIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherTOLEDO LUCAS COUNTY LIBRARY: $12,000 · OtherISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC: $15,000 · Other+21 more: $106,500 · Other+21 morePITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $169,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INCRiverbend Equine Therapy: $40,000 · Arts & CultureRiverbend Equine TherapyPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC PITTSBURGH: $11,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $141,000 · EducationLITERACY PITTSBURGHTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $15,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEM…MAUMEE VALLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationMAUMEE VALLEY COUNTRY D…THE ELLIS SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationTHE ELLIS SCHOOL+2 more: $9,000 · EducationJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY: $30,000 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $9,000 · Human Services+2 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE: $45,000 · Civil RightsHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,500 · AnimalsTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsKITTY QUEEN CAT RESCUE INC: $1,500 · AnimalsCONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $9,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$335,500Arts & Culture$241,500Education$187,000Human Services$55,000Civil Rights$45,000Animals$25,000Food & Nutrition$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $169,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $141,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE: $45,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetRiverbend Equine Therapy: $40,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetTHE KENSICO CEMETERY: $34,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo: $22,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAUMEE VALLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC PITTSBURGH: $11,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTHY ISLAND PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLIS SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAGADUCE MUSIC LENDING LIBRARY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAD FOR LITERACY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROTOHAVEN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERS PGH CORP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILKINSBURG COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heinz EndowmentsHillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…Eqt FoundationToledo Community Foun…The Burke FoundationThe Burke Family Foun…McCune Foundation Pnc…The Fine FoundationThe O-I Charities Fou…
The Heinz EndowmentsPA29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The Burke Foundation · The Burke Family Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · The Fine Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Dina W Block Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Dina W Block Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul and Dina W Block’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home