Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$675k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$3.5MHealth$1.9MHuman Services$490kReligion$490kEducation$449kInternational$425kCrime & Legal$105kHousing & Shelter$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIGHTHOUSE CHURCH$100,000
EMERSON ROSE HEART FOUNDATION$80,000
NORTH GEORGIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$70,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION$50,000
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
ABOUTFACE--USA INC$40,000
BALD RIDGE LODGE INC$40,000
CREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC$40,000
KIDZ 2 LEADERS INC$40,000
WEST GEORGIA AUTISM FOUNDATION INC$25,000
FREEDOM ALLIANCE$25,000
PAWS FOR LIFE USA INC$25,000
FREEDOM ALLIANCE$25,000
THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATIO$20,000
JESSES HOUSE INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUTHERAN HOMES OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 16%ABOUTFACE--USA INC: $40k → 4%CREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC: $200k → 9%LUTHERAN HOMES OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 16%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $40k → 4%CREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC: $40k → 9%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $20k → 4%ABOUTFACE--USA INC: $10k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $10k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $10k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $10k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $5k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $5k → 4%BALD RIDGE LODGE INC: $5k → 4%JESSES HOUSE INC: $20k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

CA
VA
DE
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 20 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$3.7M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +187%
  • FREEDOM ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +112%
  • CE
    CREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $240k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • DF
    DJA Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $3.5M · revenue -93% · 98% of their budget
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $115k · revenue 0%
  • AF
    AWAKENING FIRES MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
2
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

3
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…

Civil Rights
4
The Childrens Haven Inc

To promote the health and happiness of children impacted by abuse. We are committed to building successful children by providing programs that ensure their safety, advocate on their behalf and respond to meet their needs.

Civil Rights
5
Central Georgia Casa Inc

Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…

Civil Rights
6
Southwest Georgia Children's Alliance Inc

Southwest georgia children's alliance, inc. is a nonprofit corporation organized under the georgia nonprofit corporation act, having for its principal purpose is to be the prominent regional collaborative community resource for children…

Crime & Legal
7
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
8
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

9
Run for the Fallen Inc

Benefit fallen soldiers

Human Services
10
United Methodist Children's Home of the North Ga Conference Inc

To restore children and families from trauma through jesus christ (see schedule o).

Human Services
11
Ascensa Health Inc

Ascensa health provides a behavioral health system of care that sustains recovery and returns individuals to their communities and families.

Health
12
Methodist Home of the South Georgia Conference Inc

The methodist home of the south georgia conference, inc. is a multi-site, multipurpose organization that provides residential placement for 165 youth in fiscal year 2025. the main campus is located in macon, georgia with youth living in…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Murphy-Harpst Children's Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dja Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Veteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Senior LivingCommunity Arts OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%23%<5yr14%51%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 23% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DJA Foundation — $3,453,103 · PhilanthropyDJA Foundation+1 more — $70,000 · PhilanthropyMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $1,550,000 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUT…EMERSON ROSE HEART FOUNDATION — $210,000 · HealthEMERSON ROSE HEART FOUNDAT…+2 more — $55,000 · HealthAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $367,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE …LIGHTHOUSE CHURCH — $357,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE CHURCHAWAKENING FIRES MINISTRY INC — $60,000 · OtherCOLQUITTMILLER ARTS COUNCIL INC — $45,000 · Other+25 more — $391,500 · Other+25 moreCREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC — $240,000 · Human ServicesBALD RIDGE LODGE INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesLutheran Homes of South Carolina Foundation — $60,000 · Human ServicesAboutFace - USA — $50,000 · Human ServicesJESSES HOUSE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $310,000 · InternationalSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $115,000 · ReligionKIDZ2LEADERS INC — $75,000 · ReligionHOLY SPIRIT RANCH INC — $10,000 · ReligionTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $80,000 · EducationDEKALB MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · Education
Philanthropy$3,523,103Health$1,815,000Other$1,220,500Human Services$475,000International$310,000Religion$200,000Education$92,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDJA Foundation — $3,453,103 over 1y, 98% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $1,550,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $310,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCREATIVE ENTERPRISES INC — $240,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetEMERSON ROSE HEART FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $115,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALD RIDGE LODGE INC — $105,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDZ2LEADERS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLutheran Homes of South Carolina Foundation — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAboutFace - USA — $50,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCOLQUITTMILLER ARTS COUNCIL INC — $45,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIA — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHALL DAWSON CASA PROGRAM INC — $30,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Extension Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJESSES HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF FLORIDA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES OF CHILDREN UNDER STRESS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMARINE RAIDER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSouth Forsyth Rotary Charities Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · United Way of Forsyth County Inc · Benjamin F Brady Charitable Foundat · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Fraser-Parker Foundation · The Choate Foundation (Fka Choate Bridges Foundation) · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Patterson Barclay Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph