Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pattee Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$670k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$7.3MHuman Services$6.6MArts & Culture$1.8MEducation$803kCommunity Improvement$760kPublic Benefit$300kHealth$100kMembership Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $435k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jamieson Community Center$670,000
Warren County Fair Agricultural Ass$625,000
Buchanan Center for the Arts$465,000
City of Monmouth$160,000
Central Warren County FPD$150,000
Individual grant recipient$125,000
American Legion Auxilary$25,000
Maple City Field of Dreams$15,000
United School District$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Jamieson Community Center: $1.8M → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $1.5M → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $1.1M → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $1.1M → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $670k → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $158k → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $50k → 16%Jamieson Community Center: $50k → 16%Roseville Kids Place: $25k → 16%Roseville Community Center: $18k → 16%Roseville Community Center: $15k → 16%Roseville Kids Place: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 10 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$16M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

40%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $805k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +305% · 70% of their budget
  • RK
    Roseville Kids Place
    2× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +7%
  • TR
    The Roseville Community Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +18% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • CS
    Carl Sandburg College
    one grant, 2019 · $450k
  • MR
    Monmouth Roseville School District
    one grant, 2017 · $410k
  • WC
    Warren County Historical Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $375k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redmond Learning Center & Childcare

To provide quality and affordable child care. Presently providing care to approximately 70 families with children ages 6 weeks through 12 years of age.

—
2
Moniteau County Nutrition Center

Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.

—
3
Redwood Playhouse

Provide a venue for performing arts in Garberville, CA including theatre, dance music and other performing arts

Arts & Culture
4
Cambridge Regional Health Center

Provide medical and dental service to Cambridge Area

—
5
Roseland Community Center Inc

Roseland community center is a non-profit, community-based institution that serves the local community.

—
6
Brandon Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provides services to senior citizens

Human Services
7
Malone Adult Center Inc

Providing information & services for the Elderly and Disabled, making referrals for services such as home health aides, housekeeping services, nursing and therapy services. Provide recreational events, transportation, meals and community…

Food & Nutrition
8
Woodstock Recreation Center Inc

The Woodstock Recreation Center is a community recreation and fitness center providing classes and youth sports programs to Woodstock and the surrounding towns.

Recreation & Sports
9
Minneluzahan Senior Center

Provide social and recreational activities for senior citizens.

Human Services
10
South Park Senior Citizens Center

Activities for area senior citizens

—
11
Wellington Senior Center Inc

Provide senior citizen services

—
12
Rosebud Economic Development Corp

Provide economic development for the Rosebud area.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roseville Kids Place; the most unlike its peers is Buchanan Center for the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Warren County YMCA: $4,350,000 · OtherWarren County YMCAIndividual grant recipient: $2,360,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCity of Monmouth: $1,100,000 · OtherCity of MonmouthWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $625,000 · OtherWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYWarren County Fair Agricultural Ass: $625,000 · OtherWarren County Fair Agricultural AssCarl Sandburg College: $450,000 · OtherMonmouth Roseville School District: $410,000 · OtherWarren County Historical Museum: $375,000 · Other+13 more: $510,000 · OtherJAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $6,482,500 · Human ServicesJAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER+2 more: $67,500 · Human ServicesBuchanan Center for the Arts: $750,000 · Arts & CultureMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationRAINBOW RIDERS NFP: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsMAPLE CITY FIELD OF DREAMS: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$10,805,000Human Services$6,550,000Arts & Culture$750,000Education$300,000Recreation & Sports$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $6,482,500 over 8y, 70% of budgetBuchanan Center for the Arts: $750,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWarren Achievement Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRAINBOW RIDERS NFP: $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetRoseville Kids Place: $35,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetThe Roseville Community Center Inc: $32,500 over 2y, 31% of budgetMAPLE CITY FIELD OF DREAMS: $15,000 over 1y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Buchanan Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Warren Achievement Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW RIDERS NFP ↗
  • Who funds Roseville Kids Place ↗
  • Who funds The Roseville Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE CITY FIELD OF DREAMS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Addleman FoundationIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Addleman Foundation · Warren County United Way · Twomey Foundation · Galesburg Community Foundation · Ea Mellinger Educational Foundation Inc · Community Health Foundation of Warren & Henderson Counties · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pattee Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pattee Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pattee Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pattee Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pattee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph