Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$464k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$727kEducation$711kHuman Services$355kHealth$75kYouth Development$73kArts & Culture$72kAnimals$68kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN$80,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$58,000
LEAVEN$34,000
MINNEHAHA ACADEMY$32,500
HUNGER TASK FORCE$25,000
WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FDN$25,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY - ST PAUL$25,000
ST PETERS LUTHERAN SCHOOL$25,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$13,000
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER$12,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH WISCONSIN$10,000
SALVATION ARMY OF WI AND UPPER MI$10,000
MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION$10,000
JAKES DIAPERS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JAKES DIAPERS INC: $10k → 11%JAKES DIAPERS INC: $5k → 11%JAKES DIAPERS INC: $5k → 11%JAKES DIAPERS INC: $5k → 11%LEAVEN: $34k → 6%LEAVEN: $34k → 6%LEAVEN: $34k → 6%LEAVEN: $34k → 6%LEAVEN: $32k → 6%MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION: $5k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $12k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 31 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
5

Total granted

$2.1M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+37%

Still filing today

74%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $237k · revenue +25%
  • LI
    LEAVEN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $168k · revenue +39%
  • MA
    MINNEHAHA ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $148k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRAND CHUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • LY
    LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • BI
    BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +216%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…

—
3
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
4
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
5
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
8
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
9
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
10
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
11
Wisconsin Bankers Association

We actively advocate, educate and support our members to help them positively impact the wisconsin communities they serve.

—
12
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Our Pack Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $352,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONS…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $237,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDST PETERS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $125,000 · OtherST PETERS LUTHERAN SCHOOLCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $125,000 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAULHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $95,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCSALVATION ARMY OF WI AND UPPER MI: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF WI AND UPPER MIBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GTR MILWAUKEE: $35,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GTR MILWAUKE…BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $33,000 · OtherGRAND CHUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WISCONSIN PUBLIC TV: $22,000 · OtherCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC: $25,000 · OtherCOTS INC: $23,000 · Other+7 more: $87,000 · Other+7 moreMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $147,500 · EducationMINNEHAHA ACADEMYWINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationWINONA STATE UNIVERSIT…Marquette University: $48,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $42,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY I…University of St Thomas: $34,500 · EducationUniversity of St Thoma…MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationLEAVEN INC: $168,000 · Human ServicesLEAVEN INCSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $47,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMI…JAKE'S DIAPERS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJAKE'S DIAPERS…MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE DIAP…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · HealthTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $25,000 · HealthWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $37,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $36,000 · AnimalsOUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $32,000 · Animals
Food & Nutrition$589,000Other$645,500Education$424,000Human Services$265,000Health$75,000Arts & Culture$72,000Animals$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $352,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $237,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEAVEN INC: $168,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $147,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $47,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $37,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $36,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $34,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $32,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJAKE'S DIAPERS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCOTS INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds LEAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEHAHA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds JAKE'S DIAPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation IncDE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · United Way Fox Cities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patrick J and Janet L Thompson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph