Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
16
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
3
’18
0
’19
3
’20
2
’21
1
’22
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2017
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$500,000
States reached, FY2017
12
Total assets, FY2017
$141k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
85% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$2.9MSocial Science$2.7MRecreation & Sports$796kHuman Services$602kPhilanthropy$125kHealth$88kInternational$25kArts & Culture$25kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MN
NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
VA
AZ
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Salmon Whitewater Park Association Inc$796,000185%
Moms for America Inc$300,00016%
No Greater Love$250,000185%
Mercatus Center Inc$200,00020%
Pembroke College Foundation Inc$133,334236%
The Jed Foundation$35,00020%
Free to Choose Network Inc$25,00011%
Council on Foreign Relations Inc$25,00010%
Women of Mena in Technology$25,000113%
Cato Institute$10,00010%
Foundation for Economic Education Inc$10,00010%
Institute for Justice$10,0001n/a
Connect to Compete Inc$5,00010%
Shaya Barnett Foundation Inc$5,0001n/a
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$2,50010%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($4.5M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalmon Whitewater Park Association Inc: $796,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetMoms for America Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetNo Greater Love: $250,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPembroke College Foundation Inc: $133,334 over 2y, 36% of budgetThe Jed Foundation: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFree to Choose Network Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCouncil on Foreign Relations Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen of Mena in Technology: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCato Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetConnect to Compete Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc

How much does Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc give?
Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc reported 16 grants totaling $1,422,000 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (39%), Social Science (37%), Recreation & Sports (11%).
Who are Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Salmon Whitewater Park Association Inc ($796k), Moms for America Inc ($300k), No Greater Love ($250k).
Does Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc based?
Patrick Byrne Foundation Inc is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patrick Byrne’s filings →

More from the funding graph