Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patricia A Bresky Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$9.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$14MHealth$2.8MEnvironment$850kEducation$845kCivil Rights$600kFood & Nutrition$375kAnimals$350kHousing & Shelter$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $9.1M
$125,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAFgiving360$9,120,000
David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust$200,000
Re Wild$150,000
Clean Air Task Force Inc$150,000
Care Dimensions$150,000
Feeding America$150,000
Common Threads Project$130,000
Neighborhood School$125,000
The Park School$75,000
Stone House$75,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
William James College$50,000
Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare$30,000
The Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research$25,000
William and Mary Edward and Frances Shifman Scholarship$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Voices and Faces Project: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 18 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$6.3M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-8%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +113%
  • Care Dimensions Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $765k · revenue +15%
  • REWILD
    4× · 2022–2025 · $425k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SD
    Schwab Donor Advised Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $5.1M
  • CM
    Children's Medical Center Corporation co Boston Children's Hospital Trust
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
3
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
4
Securebio Inc

To reduce catastrophic risks from novel biotechnologies by conducting research on pandemic prevention, detection, and mitigation.

Science & Tech
5
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
6
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
7
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
12
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stonehouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAFgiving360: $9,120,000 · OtherDAFgiving360Schwab Donor Advised Fund: $5,105,000 · OtherSchwab Donor Advised FundCare Dimensions Inc: $765,000 · OtherCommon Threads Project: $575,000 · Other+12 more: $1,431,500 · Other+12 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,600,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthREWILD: $425,000 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $350,000 · AnimalsCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $425,000 · EnvironmentFeeding America: $375,000 · Food & NutritionNEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS INC: $185,000 · EducationPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $175,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH: $100,000 · Philanthropy
Other$16,996,500Health$1,600,500Animals$775,000Environment$425,000Food & Nutrition$375,000Education$360,000Philanthropy$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,600,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $765,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREWILD: $425,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $425,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $375,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $350,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS INC: $185,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH: $100,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOICES & FACES PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Care Dimensions Inc ↗
  • Who funds REWILD ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STONEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patricia A Bresky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patricia A Bresky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 82%
  • Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc: 82% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Patricia A Bresky Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Patricia A Bresky Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patricia A Bresky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph