Skip to content
Pastime With Purpose Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Pastime With Purpose Inc

Pastime with purpose partners with socially conscious professional athletes and utilizes their platforms and profile to deliver impact that exceeds any one cause, event, or contribution.

$235k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$336kRecreation & Sports$197kInternational$109kEducation$96kHealth$18kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$10kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $228,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $235,368 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,368 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$34,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$50,000
PUTNAM CITY OPTIMIST$45,000
NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH$34,500
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INC$34,500
PRO ATHLETES OUTREACH$23,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$23,000
SPECTRUM LOVE$10,000
KEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHOC FOUNDATION: $18k → 10%OAKLAND A'S COMMUNITY FUND: $8k → 10%NYC POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%KODA: $9k → 20%KEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $50k → 10%MORE THAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $45k → 16%PUTNAM CITY OPTIMIST: $45k → 16%SPECTRUM LOVE: $10k → 9%THE BASEBALL CHAPEL: $22k → 12%OPERATION SHOWER: $10k → 11%HEARTS 2 HONDURAS: $8k → 14%PRO ATHLETES OUTREACH: $44k → 3%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $35k → 9%INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $44k → 7%CAL RIPKEN SENIOR FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH: $208k → 15%FDNY FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%PUTNAM CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%PRO ATHLETES OUTREACH: $23k → 3%NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH: $72k → 15%PUTNAM CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 16%NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH: $35k → 15%PUTNAM CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 3 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
13

Total granted

$448k
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+35%

Still filing today

33%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthReligionCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $315k
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $67k · revenue +10%
  • PA
    Pro Athletes Outreach
    2× · 2023–2024 · $67k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • MT
    MORE THAN BASEBALL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +46%
  • BC
    BASEBALL CHAPEL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olympic Club Foundation

Our mission is to financially support programs which share our belief that participation in organized athletics enriches young lives and develops future community leaders.

Religion
2
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
3
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
4
Giants Community Fund

The giants community fund (the "fund") uses baseball and softball to promote health, education, and character development to propel youth in underserved regions to be positive forces in their communities. the fund, a 501(c)(3) public…

Philanthropy
5
Professional Athletes Foundation

Professional athletes foundation provides grant assistance to support any former professional and amateur football player or his immediate family member in times of financial crisis. professional athletes foundation also provides wellness…

Recreation & Sports
6
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
The Ruben Amaro Sr Foundation

Our mission is to level the playing field for every student athlete deserving of collegiate showcase opportunities and tournament experience regardless of financial constraints. we are focusing primarily on raising money now to offset team…

Recreation & Sports
9
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
10
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
11
Colorado State Fire Chiefs

The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Oakland Athletics Community Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH: $314,591 · OtherNORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCHTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCPUTNAM CITY OPTIMIST YOUTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherPUTNAM CITY OPTIMIST YOUTH FOUNDATIONMORE THAN BASEBALL INC: $45,000 · OtherMORE THAN BASEBALL INCBASEBALL CHAPEL INC: $21,800 · Other+5 more: $48,787 · Other+5 moreINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $66,600 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL J…Compassion International Incorporated: $34,500 · InternationalCompassion Inte…Hearts2Honduras Inc: $8,000 · InternationalHearts2Honduras…Oklahoma State University Foundation: $40,000 · EducationOklahoma S…CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $17,591 · EducationCAL RIPKEN…PUTNAM CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $8,028 · EducationPUTNAM CIT…KEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationKEEPER OF …Pro Athletes Outreach: $66,600 · ReligionPro Athle…CHOC FOUNDATION: $17,500 · HealthNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalOPERATION SHOWER: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$525,178International$109,100Education$73,619Religion$66,600Health$17,500Crime & Legal$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $66,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $17,591 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SHOWER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKODA ARTS INC: $8,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetKEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetHearts2Honduras Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Major League Baseball…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Major League Baseball Players TrustNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Players Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pastime With Purpose Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pastime With Purpose Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pastime With Purpose Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pastime With Purpose Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pastime With Purpose’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home