· Public charity
Pastime With Purpose Inc
Pastime with purpose partners with socially conscious professional athletes and utilizes their platforms and profile to deliver impact that exceeds any one cause, event, or contribution.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $228,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $235,368 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,368 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS | $50,000 |
| PUTNAM CITY OPTIMIST | $45,000 |
| NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH | $34,500 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INC | $34,500 |
| PRO ATHLETES OUTREACH | $23,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION | $23,000 |
| SPECTRUM LOVE | $10,000 |
| KEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTHSTAR COMMUNITY CHURCH3× · 2022–2024 · $315k
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION2× · 2023–2024 · $67k · revenue +10%
- PAPro Athletes Outreach2× · 2023–2024 · $67k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- MTMORE THAN BASEBALL INCone grant, 2022 · $45k
- OSOklahoma State University Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +46%
- BCBASEBALL CHAPEL INCone grant, 2023 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to financially support programs which share our belief that participation in organized athletics enriches young lives and develops future community leaders.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
The giants community fund (the "fund") uses baseball and softball to promote health, education, and character development to propel youth in underserved regions to be positive forces in their communities. the fund, a 501(c)(3) public…
Professional athletes foundation provides grant assistance to support any former professional and amateur football player or his immediate family member in times of financial crisis. professional athletes foundation also provides wellness…
Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Our mission is to level the playing field for every student athlete deserving of collegiate showcase opportunities and tournament experience regardless of financial constraints. we are focusing primarily on raising money now to offset team…
The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…
To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.
The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…
Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Oakland Athletics Community Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Pro Athletes Outreach ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MORE THAN BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FDNY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SHOWER ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KODA ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND ATHLETICS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds KEEPER OF THE GAME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hearts2Honduras Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Players Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pastime With Purpose Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pastime With Purpose Inc?
Find your warmest path to Pastime With Purpose Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.