Skip to content
Pashaie Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Pashaie Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$75kInternational$18kReligion$16kHuman Services$5kEducation$3kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,040
Median grant
4
States reached
$699
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation Council of Greate$5,000
Israel Independence Fund$3,000
Magbit Foundation$2,400
St Ambrose Church$2,250
American Friends of Noam Eliezer In$1,520
ETTA$1,500
Colel Chabad$1,040
Friends of the Israel Defense Force$1,000
NACHAL AVRAHAM INC$746
SINAI TEMPLE$720
American Friends of Tiferet Shlomo$520
Daughters of St Paul$500
CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM$252
St Brendan Catholic Church$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 14%IRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 14%IRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 11 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$95k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

45%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Hope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +56%
  • MF
    MAGBIT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +172%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF PERSIAN YOUTH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
5
Israel Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
6
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
8
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Chasdei Ish Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Life Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Israel Independence Fund; the most unlike its peers is Magbit Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGBIT FOUNDATION: $13,900 · OtherMAGBIT FOUNDATIONVARIOUS - 5 CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 600 EACH: $7,876 · OtherVARIOUS - 5 CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 600 EACHST AMBROSE CHURCH: $6,850 · OtherST AMBROSE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $6,674 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJewish Federation Council of Greate: $5,000 · OtherJewish Federation Council of GreateTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $4,250 · OtherTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTA…Individual grant recipient: $3,686 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAUGHTERS OF ST PAUL INC: $2,560 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,260 · Other+15 more: $12,700 · Other+15 moreHope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities: $40,460 · PhilanthropyHope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewi…THE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUNDAMUDEI CHESED INC: $2,116 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,266 · PhilanthropyIRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $11,100 · Human ServicesIRANIAN J…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC: $4,692 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,260 · International
Other$65,756Philanthropy$46,842Human Services$11,100Education$4,692International$2,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities: $40,460 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMAGBIT FOUNDATION: $13,900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetIRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $11,100 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC: $4,692 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $4,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $2,116 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNACHAL AVRAHAM INC: $746 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tiferet Shlomo Boys Orphanage Inc: $520 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hope Foundation of Iranian-American Jewish Communities ↗
  • Who funds MAGBIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IRANIAN JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC ↗
  • Who funds TIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMUDEI CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds NACHAL AVRAHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tiferet Shlomo Boys Orphanage Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pashaie Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pashaie Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pashaie Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home