Skip to content
Partnership to End Addiction at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Partnership to End Addiction

With decades of experience in research, direct service, communications and partnership-building, we provide families with personalized support and resources - while mobilizing policymakers, researchers and health care professionals to better address addiction (see schedule o) systemically on a national scale.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$343k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.5MEducation$900kCommunity Improvement$124kRecreation & Sports$99kScience & Tech$60kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $323k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $469k
  • $250k+1 grant · $343k
$33,829
Median grant
11
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$342,769
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$170,877
PACE UNIVERSITY$134,685
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$85,128
BOSTON MEDICAL$77,939
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$47,776
SAM HOUSTON STATE$44,708
UNIV OF MD B-MORE$34,283
CHESTNUT HEALTH$33,829
MARYLAND TREATMENT CENTER$30,876
YALE UNIVERSITY$29,046
UCONN HEALTH$25,403
OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER$24,783
UNIV OF NEW MEXICO$15,474
EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$13,551
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $85k → 16%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $12k → 22%PACE UNIVERSITY: $135k → 9%Health Research Incorporated: $164k → 14%EVERYDAY HEALTH CENTER: $11k → 17%Sam Houston State University: $33k → 20%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 21%OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 15%YALE UNIVERSITY: $29k → 12%EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $29k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $28k → 14%Ohio University: $19k → 22%CORNERSTONE SYSTEMS NORTH WEST: $124k → 12%CHESTNUT HEALTH: $34k → 11%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $51k → 14%Virginia Commonwealth University: $33k → 22%MARYLAND TREATMENT CENTER: $44k → 19%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $73k → 16%Health Research Incorporated: $160k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERISTY: $44k → 17%Sam Houston State University: $33k → 20%OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 15%EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $48k → 14%Virginia Commonwealth University: $26k → 22%MARYLAND TREATMENT CENTER: $32k → 19%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $32k → 16%Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc: $88k → 14%Research Foundation Of the City University of New York: $35k → 17%SAM HOUSTON STATE: $45k → 20%MARYLAND TREATMENT CENTER: $31k → 19%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc: $76k → 14%Research Foundation Of the City University of New York: $35k → 17%SAM HOUSTON STATE: $25k → 20%MARYLAND TREATMENT CENTER: $16k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL: $78k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $171k → 17%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 20%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $34k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 20%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERISTY: $31k → 19%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $30k → 19%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $21k → 19%UNIV OF MD B-MORE: $34k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $27k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
VA
MD
NM
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Partnership to End Addiction’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Partnership to End Addictionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 19 repeat orgs$402k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$2.9M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+18%

Still filing today

58%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $732k · revenue +42%
  • HR
    HEALTH RESEARCH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $324k · revenue +32%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $201k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • CS
    CORNERSTONE SYSTEMS NORTH WEST
    one grant, 2023 · $124k
  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2020 · $44k
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yale University; the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $732,278 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCHHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $324,464 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH INCChildren's Hospital Corporation: $200,963 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $164,269 · HealthRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INCBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $112,064 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION+2 more: $49,960 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $403,783 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $175,918 · OtherSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITYMARYLAND TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $129,614 · OtherMARYLAND TREATMENT CENTERS INCCORNERSTONE SYSTEMS NORTH WEST: $123,500 · OtherCORNERSTONE SYSTEMS NORTH WESTUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $61,418 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $59,559 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER: $44,088 · OtherNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $43,943 · OtherEAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $42,414 · Other+6 more: $101,668 · Other+6 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $361,572 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA…PACE UNIVERSITY: $134,685 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $82,219 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUniversity of Miami: $80,969 · EducationUniversity of MiamiResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $69,000 · EducationResearch Foundation of t…OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $44,312 · EducationOREGON SOCIAL LEARNING C…Yale University: $29,046 · Education+1 more: $12,030 · EducationNorthwestern University: $98,838 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY: $53,136 · Community Improvement
Health$1,583,998Other$1,185,905Education$813,833Recreation & Sports$98,838Community Improvement$53,136

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $732,278 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $361,572 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $324,464 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $200,963 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $164,269 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $134,685 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $112,064 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $98,838 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $82,219 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $80,969 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $69,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $53,136 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $44,312 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $39,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $29,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $12,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emory UniversityThe Trustees of Colum…Johns Hopkins Univers…University of MiamiUniversity of Souther…Yale UniversityUniversity of Pittsbu…
Emory UniversityGA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emory University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · University of Miami · University of Southern California · Yale University · University of Pittsburgh

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partnership to End Addiction funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partnership to End Addiction. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Oregon Social Learning Center Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partnership to End Addiction’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home