Skip to content
Partnership Carson City at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Partnership Carson City

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs, alcohol use and other at risk activities.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$537kYouth Development$369kEducation$313kArts & Culture$132kCrime & Legal$91kCommunity Improvement$29kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $104k
$104,418
Median grant
1
States reached
$216k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$104,418
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$5,256
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP OF CMTY RESOURCES: $29k → 8%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $31k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $33k → 11%PARTNERSHIP DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $16k → 8%FISH: $14k → 13%ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $7k → 13%FOOD FOR THOUGHT: $7k → 13%ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6k → 13%ADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +126% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
23

Total granted

$1.9M
$660k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+40%

Still filing today

78%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $969k · revenue +126%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada
    8× · 2017–2024 · $336k · revenue +628%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NORTHERN N
    7× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • JT
    JOIN TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA
    one grant, 2018 · $94k · revenue +21%
  • PC
    PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $83k · revenue +134%
  • JR
    JUSTICE RESEARCH LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership Carson City

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs,…

Youth Development
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
4
Rise Up Reno Prevention Network

Creating healthier choices for children & youth in reno county through mentoring, substance use prevention, and strengthening families.

Youth Development
5
Northern Nevada Harm Reduction Alliance

Charitable

Health
6
Nevada Healthright

Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.

Health
7
Community Services of Nevada

CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and

Housing & Shelter
8
Westcare Nevada Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
9
Crime Stoppers of Nevada Inc Fka Secret Witness of Las Vegas Inc

Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. was created to involve the public in the fight against crime. Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. provides citizens with a vehicle to anonymously supply Law Enforcement with information about a crime or wanted…

—
10
Council for a Better Nevada

The Council for a Better Nevada is an organization of concerned citizens who seek to improve the quality of life in Nevada. Our intention is to identify and engage in community issues whose outcomes will greatly affect the lives of…

Community Improvement
11
Faith Wellness Services Incorporated

F.A.I.T.H. WELLNESS SERVICES is a Nevada non-profit organization that has been formed with the goal of bringing together the most appropriate resources to help our local community regain our stride and become even strong

Health
12
Nevada Council On Problem Gambling

The nevada council on problem gambling is a non-profit information and referral agency whose efforts are focused on reducing the impact of problem gambling on individuals, families and communities in nevada. it is the mission of the nevada…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frontier Community Coalition; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Museum of Northern N. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $968,985 · Crime & LegalRON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERBoys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada: $335,632 · OtherBoys and Girls Clubs of Western NevadaUNITED LATINO COMMUNITY: $126,628 · OtherUNITED LATINO COMMUNITYCARSON CITY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $95,345 · OtherCARSON CITY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICESJUSTICE RESEARCH LLC: $61,077 · OtherJUSTICE RESEARCH LLCHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON: $40,384 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherCARE COALITION: $35,486 · OtherCARSON CITY JUVENILE SERVICES: $30,159 · Other+9 more: $127,902 · Other+9 moreCARSON CITY COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $95,000 · HealthCARSON CITY COMMUN…JOIN TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA: $94,445 · HealthJOIN TOGETHER NORT…COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $92,256 · HealthCOMMUNITY COUNSELI…PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES: $82,881 · HealthPACT COALITION FOR…PARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE: $36,799 · HealthPARTNERS ALLIED FO…FRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION: $33,373 · HealthFRONTIER COMMUNITY…PARTNERSHIP DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $76,365 · Human ServicesHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES: $32,830 · Human ServicesADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $19,079 · Human ServicesFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING EMERGENCY REFERRAL SERVICE: $14,402 · Human ServicesFood for Thought Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NORTHERN N: $125,457 · Arts & CultureNYE COMMUNITIES COALITION: $16,500 · Community ImprovementNAMI Western Nevada: $7,241 · Public Benefit
Crime & Legal$968,985Other$892,613Health$434,754Human Services$149,676Arts & Culture$125,457Community Improvement$16,500Public Benefit$7,241

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $968,985 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada: $335,632 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NORTHERN N: $125,457 over 7y, 20% of budgetCARSON CITY COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $95,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJOIN TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA: $94,445 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $92,256 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES: $82,881 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $76,365 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE: $36,799 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetFRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION: $33,373 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES: $32,830 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetADVOCATES TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $19,079 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNYE COMMUNITIES COALITION: $16,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING EMERGENCY REFERRAL SERVICE: $14,402 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFood for Thought Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCARSON CITY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $6,500 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baker Hughes Foundati…Partnership Douglas C…Community Foundation …America's CharitiesThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Baker Hughes FoundationTX16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baker Hughes Foundation · Partnership Douglas County Inc · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · America's Charities · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partnership Carson City funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partnership Carson City. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Partnership Carson City?

    Find your warmest path to Partnership Carson City through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Partnership Carson City’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home