How much did PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY grant in FY2023?

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY reported 10 grants totaling $420,771 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY based?

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY is based in NV.

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city, nevada, by preventing involvement in, and reversing the effects, gangs, drugs, alcohol use and other at-risk.

$421k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$108k

Largest

01What you fund

0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Crime & Legal$710kHealth$390kHuman Services$144kArts & Culture$109kCommunity Improvement$17kPublic Benefit$7kOther$682k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

issues

2023

issues

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

$10k–50k8 grants · $252k
$50k–250k2 grants · $169k

$40,384

Median grant

States reached

$542k

Total assets

Largest grants

RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$108,010
JUSTICE RESEARCH LLC$61,077
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$47,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN NV$41,881
HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON$40,384
CARSON CITY JUVENILE SERVICES$30,159
CAPITAL CITY CIRCLES$27,785
CHURCHILL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES$27,262
CARSON CITY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES$20,345
PARTNERSHIP DOUGLAS COUNTY INC$16,368

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$623k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +138% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$464k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%

+40%

Still filing today

75%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RW
RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
6× · 2018–2023 · $710k · revenue +46%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN NV
6× · 2018–2023 · $253k · revenue +628%
CC
CAPITAL CITY CIRCLES
6× · 2018–2023 · $109k · revenue +36%

Funded once

JT
JOIN TOGETHER NORTHERN NV
one grant, 2018 · $94k · revenue +7%
PC
PACT COALITIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $83k · revenue +107%
CC
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $48k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Rural Nevada Counseling

The organization provides drug and alcohol abuse treatment programs and counseling services to the citizens of lyon county, nevada.

—

Community Wellness Collective

mental health, drug abuse support

Health

Healthy Nevada

Health

Community Coalition for Families and

Community Partnership delivers programs and services that strengthen families, so that all Teller County families are self-reliant, fully functional, and positive contributors to our community.

Health

Homeless Resource Council

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—

Care Coalition

To increase public awareness of the effects of drug and alcohol abuse by educating and supporting the community and drug prevention agencies in clark county, thus promoting health and reducing substance abuse.

Health

Finney County Community Health Coalition

To provide its community with access to information and services that promote good health and well-being for all residents.

Health

Partnership Carson City

Youth Development

Council of Community Clinics

A premier consortium of primary health care organizations, hcp is an advocate for its members who serve the health needs of communities throughout southern california, providing them with the voice and power to serve vulnerable populations.

—

Community Services of Nevada

CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and

Housing & Shelter

Northwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc

ORGANIZATIONS MISSION: We foster equitable access to health and well-being resources so our community can thrive. Oragnizations Vision: To help people live longer, healthier lives.

Health

Community Counseling & Correctional Serv

Provide treatment, training & supervision to youth & adults, primarily those incarcerated.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Counseling Center and the most unlike its peers is Nye Communities Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

14/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Crime & Legal$710,067Other$681,526Health$389,998Human Services$143,816Arts & Culture$109,217Community Improvement$16,500Public Benefit$7,241

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Baker Hughes Foundation · Partnership Douglas County Inc · America's Charities · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAPITAL CITY CIRCLES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 880236615 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAPITAL CITY CIRCLES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Partnership Carson City?

Find your warmest path to Partnership Carson City through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partnership Carson City?

More from the funding graph

PARTNERSHIP CARSON CITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partnership Carson City?

More from the funding graph