· Public charity
Partners of the Americas Inc
We connect people and organizations across and within borders to serve and change lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $223,144 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,953,343 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,730,199 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $168k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIAL ACCOUNTABIILITY INTERNATIONAL INC-SAI | $55,144 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE | $45,000 |
| GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY | $45,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY | $45,000 |
| COMMOTION - COMMUNITY IN MOTION | $16,500 |
| SCIENTIFIC CARIBBEAN FOUNDATION INC | $16,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $4.7M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROJECT TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN ECUADOR · EXTERNAL AUDIT FOR POA, SUB RECIPIENT IPAF · INCREASE ACCESS TO EDUCATION IN COLOMBIA FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS,AGES 3 TO 17 FOCUSING ON PRE-PRIMARY, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY, IN AREAS IMPACTED BY MIGRATION
Stated purpose: INCREASE WORKERS, EMPLOYERS, AND UNION LEADERS UNDERSTANDING OF MEXICOS NEW LABOR SYSTEMS AND STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITY OF INSTITUTIONS MONITORING LABOR RIGHTS AND REFORM IMPLEMENTATION. · MAINTAIN AND DEVELOP STRONG RELATIONSHIPS WITH KEY CIVIL SOCIETY ACTORS, UNIONS, AND WORKERS THAT WILL PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STRENGTHENING MEXICOS CAPACITY TO IDENTIFY, PREVENT, AND MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF THE 2026 FIFA WORLD CUP ON THE REALIZATION OF LABOR RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEES · STRENGTHEN AWARENESS OF THE MEXICAN LABOR JUSTICE REFORM AMONG WORKERS, EMPLOYERS, AND UNION LEADERS.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA5× · 2019–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +11%
- HAHIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +321%
- GAGLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR IMPROVED NUTRITION3× · 2018–2020 · $880k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINone grant, 2017 · $75k
- NSNC STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $57k
- SFSANTA FE COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $57k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Education and Research
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Salle University and the most unlike its peers is Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds HIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR IMPROVED NUTRITION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds US CIVILIAN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ASSOC FOR VOLUNTEER ACTION IN THE CARIBBEAN &THE AMERICAS INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GLENVILLE STATE COLLEGE RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MEDIA LITERACY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES UNIVERSITY OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · Hispanic Scholarship Fund · Executive Leadership Council · National Writing Project Corporation · 1890 Universities Foundation · Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Partners of the Americas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 9% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Georgian Court University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.