Skip to content
Partners in Hope at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Partners in Hope

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$29kInternational$22kHuman Services$19kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$18kHealth$6kEducation$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$510
Median grant
2
States reached
$284k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEAID DIAPER DRIVE$10,000
HOMEAID$5,000
MAYAN MIRACLE FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOL$1,000
ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$510
LEHI LONGHORN RODEO TEAM$500
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$340
FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$284
UTAH FOOD BANK$206
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%PREBORN: $500 → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 8%YOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $850 → 8%HAIKA FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
IN
PA
CA
UT
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 6 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$71k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +53%
  • MM
    MAYAN MIRACLE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +140%
  • H
    HOMEAID
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • HB
    HEARTHSTONE - BUILDER AWARD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FO
    FIELD OF DREAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
2
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
3
Utah Youth Village

The mission of utah youth village is to empower children and families and help generations to come.

Human Services
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Childsafe Colorado Inc

Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…

Crime & Legal
6
Onward Hope Incorporated

We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.

Human Services
7
Chemists Without Borders

Chemists without borders is a global humanitarian organization committed to sustainable and equitable solutions that empower communities and improve overall well-being. our strategic framework is: service - developing, facilitating, and…

Science & Tech
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
People Helping People

People helping people (php) is dedicated to reducing the number of children living in poverty by teaching low-income women, primarily single moms, how to earn a living wage. each year, 1,000 prospective clients enroll in our employment…

Human Services
10
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
11
Mount St Vincent Home Inc

As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.

—
12
The Helm Foundation

At the helm foundation, our vision is a world where every child and woman can thrive regardless of background or circumstance. we are committed to breaking the cycle of poverty through education, healthcare, and sustainable development. in…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center; the most unlike its peers is Haika Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK: $28,378 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKHOMEAID: $15,000 · OtherHOMEAIDHOMEAID DIAPER DRIVE: $10,000 · OtherHOMEAID DIAPER DRIVEHEARTHSTONE - BUILDER AWARD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherHEARTHSTONE - BUILDER AWARD FOUNDATIONFIELD OF DREAMS: $7,500 · OtherFIELD OF DREAMSIndividual grant recipient: $4,495 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more: $7,750 · Other+9 moreMAYAN MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $22,300 · InternationalMAYAN MIRACLE FOUND…HAIKA FOUNDATION: $3,350 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1,412 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $850 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born Inc: $500 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $2,000 · EducationAlpine School District Foundation: $1,117 · EducationUTAH PROFESSIONAL WOMEN IN BUILDING: $1,000 · EducationAmerican Heritage Schools Inc: $1,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC: $850 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,500 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $1,400 · HealthSaprea: $500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $340 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $200 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY: $1,213 · Food & NutritionTETON VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC: $600 · Food & NutritionOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$83,123International$22,300Human Services$7,112Education$5,967Health$5,940Food & Nutrition$1,813Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $28,378 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYAN MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $22,300 over 6y, 11% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAIKA FOUNDATION: $3,350 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1,412 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY: $1,213 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlpine School District Foundation: $1,117 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH PROFESSIONAL WOMEN IN BUILDING: $1,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $850 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTETON VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaprea: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $340 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Utah Medical Associat…Kennecott Utah Copper…Larry H Miller and Ga…doTERRA Healing Hands…Edwards Lifesciences …Dominion Energy Chari…American Express Foun…Texas Instruments Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Express Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners in Hope funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners in Hope. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partners in Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home