Skip to content

· Private foundation

Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$45kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Benefit$20kCivil Rights$18kInternational$16kHealth$10kSocial Science$10kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $81k
$8,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$11,000
STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSN$10,000
GOULD FARM$10,000
FCNL EDUCATION FUND$10,000
ACLU$10,000
UNHCR$10,000
OPB$10,000
POPULATION CONNECTION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
ART OF NATURE CONSORTIUM$8,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$6,000
SPLC$5,000
EPIC$5,000
MANCHESTER EARLY LEARNING CENTER$5,000
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MANCHESTER EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 6 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$79k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+39%

Still filing today

83%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPublic BenefitFood & NutritionEnvironmentSocial ScienceHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • Feeding America
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • FCNL EDUCATION FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +102%
  • MC
    MANCHESTER CHURCH OF BRETHREN
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
5
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
10
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
11
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
12
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCACLU: $10,000 · OtherACLUTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INCOPB: $10,000 · OtherOPBIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientART OF NATURE CONSORTIUM: $8,000 · OtherART OF NATURE CONSORTIUMTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYOREGON FOOD BANK: $5,550 · OtherBVS CHARITY: $5,000 · OtherSPLC: $5,000 · OtherEPIC: $5,000 · Other+11 more: $16,590 · Other+11 moreFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $15,000 · Public BenefitFCNL EDUCAT…THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $5,000 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER …Feeding America: $19,570 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ame…United States Association for UNHCR: $15,000 · InternationalUnited St…+1 more: $500 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,000 · EnvironmentPOPULATION CONNECTION: $10,000 · Social ScienceMANCHESTER EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$110,140Public Benefit$20,000Food & Nutrition$19,570International$15,500Environment$11,000Social Science$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $19,570 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $5,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Hopewell House dba Hopewell House: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Manchester Early Learning Center: 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Parks & Paula Sheller Adams Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph