Skip to content
Parkland Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Parkland Cares Inc

The organization was created in response to the mass shooting at marjory stoneman douglas high school in parkland,florida to address the immediate and long term mental health needs of the surviving students, teachers and their families as well as the entire parkland community.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$60k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $180,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,076 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,076 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES (GOODMAN)$95,000
TOMORROW'S RAINBOW$40,000
FORT LAUDERDALE INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC$20,000
HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$15,000
CHILDNET INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE OPTIONS INC: $25k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE INC: $20k → 13%ISRAEL HEART2HEART INC: $10k → 13%CHILDNET INC: $10k → 13%FORT LAUDERDALE INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $20k → 13%FLITE INC: $10k → 13%FLITE INC: $10k → 13%FLITE INC: $10k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE INC: $50k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE INC: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+177%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DR STANLEY AND PEARL GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $338k · revenue +64%
  • TR
    TOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $252k · revenue +297%
  • JA
    Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $120k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NB
    NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IH
    ISRAEL HEART2HEART INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
2
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
3
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
4
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
5
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
6
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
7
Families First of Palm Beach County Foundation Inc

To cultivate financial resources dedicated to building stronger families and stronger communities through the operations and programs of families first. contributing to the foundation is an investment in a safe, healthy and sustainable…

Human Services
8
The Ljd Jewish Family & Community Services Inc

The mission of the ljd jewish family & community services, inc. is to strengthen the entire community by providing family and individual social services in the jewish tradition of helping people help themselves.

Human Services
9
Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Our mission is a seamless, accessible, recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care driven by consumers, providers, and other stakeholders, in which innovation and collaboration are the norm and diversified financial resources…

Health
10
Centerstone of Florida Inc

Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"

Health
11
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
12
The Ferd and Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children Service of Palm Beach C Ounty Inc

The mission of ferd & gladys alpert jewish family & children's service of palm beach county, inc. is to serve the community by: - providing a range of needed social services to strengthen individuals and families. - participating in…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childnet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Rainbow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DR STANLEY AND PEARL GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $338,110 · OtherDR STANLEY AND PEARL GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD COUN…JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $174,390 · OtherJFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INCNORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $251,850 · HealthTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INCHENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $85,000 · HealthHENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INCFIRST CALL FOR HELP OF BROWARD INC: $50,000 · HealthFIRST CALL FOR HELP OF BROWARD INCCHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CEN…Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption a…FLORIDA INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesFLORIDA INDEPENDE…CHILDNET INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL HEART2HEART INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $100,000 · EducationCHILDREN'…
Other$532,500Health$409,350Human Services$190,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDR STANLEY AND PEARL GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $338,110 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $251,850 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetHENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST CALL FOR HELP OF BROWARD INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDNET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL HEART2HEART INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Broward Behavioral He…Florida Panthers Foun…The Jim Moran Foundat…Childrens Aid ClubUnited Way of Broward…Hfsf Grants Managemen…The Frederick a Deluc…Greater Miami Jewish …Publix Super Markets …American Express Foun…The Bank of America C…
Community Foundation of Broward IncFL21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Broward Behavioral Health Coalition Inc · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Childrens Aid Club · United Way of Broward County Inc · Hfsf Grants Management Inc · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parkland Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parkland Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Henderson Behavioral Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Parkland Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to Parkland Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Parkland Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home