· Public charity
Broward Behavioral Health Coalition Inc
To deliver a comprehensive array of behavioral health services in the state of florida to eligible children,adolescents, adults, elders and families in the organization's service area and to subcontract with qualified, direct service, community based organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $181k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+35 grants · $95M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC | $29,014,666 |
| UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC | $7,638,042 |
| MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM | $6,510,527 |
| THE VILLAGE SOUTH | $6,113,540 |
| SOUTH FLORIDA WELLNESS NETWORK INC | $5,029,310 |
| ARCHWAYS INC | $4,995,235 |
| BROWARD COUNTY ADDICTION RECOVERY CENTER | $3,890,388 |
| THE HOUSE OF HOPE INC | $3,602,901 |
| FELLOWSHIP HOUSE | $3,095,583 |
| CARE RESOURCE | $2,946,221 |
| BANYAN HEALTH SYSTEMS | $2,862,215 |
| BROWARD HEALTH | $2,769,287 |
| FELLOWSHIP RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC | $1,905,379 |
| GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $1,697,445 |
| SMITH MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES LLC | $1,534,719 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $35.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HBHENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $180M · revenue +49% · 50% of their budget
- AIARCHWAYS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $40M · revenue +27% · 71% of their budget
- UWUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $36M · revenue +89% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- CRCARE RESOURCEone grant, 2022 · $1.9M
- CMCounseling Mediation Educationone grant, 2024 · $482k
- MAMULTICULTURAL ALLIANCE HEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS INCone grant, 2024 · $340k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is a seamless, accessible, recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care driven by consumers, providers, and other stakeholders, in which innovation and collaboration are the norm and diversified financial resources…
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"
Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…
South florida behavioral health network inc, ensures a quality system of care for people at risk and affected by substance use and mental health disorders in miami dade and monroe counties
To deliver a comprehensive array of behavioral health services in the state of florida to eligible children,adolescents, adults, elders and families in the organization's service area and to subcontract with qualified, direct service,…
Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.
We support individuals, families, and the community with our continuum of care services with integrated, culturally competent behaviourial health, substance use recovery, and rehabilitative justice services.
To develop and implement effective age-appropriate, consumer-driven, evidence-based services to prevent and reduce substance use and strengthen mental wellness across the southernmost Texas communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Archways Inc and the most unlike its peers is Susan B Anthony Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ARCHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WELLNESS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BANYAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CITRUS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CARE RESOURCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PSYCHO-SOCIAL REHABILATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN ↗
- Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FOOT PRINT TO SUCCESS CLUBHOUSEINC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds TASKFORCE FORE ENDING HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMELOT COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Childnet Inc · Hfsf Grants Management Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way of Broward County Inc · South Florida Behavioral Health Network · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc · Parkland Cares Inc · Florida Alcohol & Drug Abuse Assoc · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · The Celia Lipton Farris and Victor W Farris Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Broward Behavioral Health Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Broward County Inc — 27% of income from government
- Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc — 17% of income from government
- Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Banyan Community Health Center Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Broward Partnership for the Homeless Inc — 5% of income from government
- Lifestream Behavioral Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Broward House Inc — 5% of income from government
- Care Resource Community Health Centers Incorporated — 4% of income from government
- Broward Healthy Start Coalition — 4% of income from government
- Citrus Health Network Inc — 2% of income from government
- Carrfour Supportive Housing Inc — 2% of income from government
- Here's Help Inc — 2% of income from government
- South Florida Wellness Network Inc — 1% of income from government
- Trauma Resolution Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Journey Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
- Camelot Community Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
- Sunshine Social Services Inc — 0% of income from government
- Henderson Behavioral Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.