Loading…
· Community foundation
PARKLAND CARES INC
The organization was created in response to the mass shooting at marjory stoneman douglas high school in parkland,florida to address the immediate and long term mental health needs of the surviving students, teachers and their families as well as the entire parkland community.
$201k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$95k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of PARKLAND CARES INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
hendersonbehavioralhousing
2019
—
2020
hendersonbehavioralhousing
2021
hendersonbehavioralhousinglives
2022
youthintervention
2023
traumaisraelcombatveteransmentorshipawarenessheart heart
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
- BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES (GOODMAN)$95,000
- TOMORROW'S RAINBOW$40,000
- FORT LAUDERDALE INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC$20,000
- HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$15,000
- CHILDNET INC$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
2
Total granted
$1.2M
$30k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+68%
0%
Still filing today
80%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JOJFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC5× · 2018–2024 · $338k · revenue +55%
- TRTOMORROWS RAINBOW4× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +247%
- JAJEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE OPTIONS INC4× · 2019–2022 · $120k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- BHBROWARD HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $20k
- IHISRAEL HEART2HEART INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc
JFCS, guided by Jewish values, works with youth and other vulnerable community members of all faiths to build resilience and to achieve the social and economic stability needed to support their mental health and well-being.
Human Services
2
Child Protection Center Inc
The child protection center (cpc) operates multiple programs to aid in cpc's mission: the prevention, intervention & treatment of child abuse.
Crime & Legal
3
Ackerman Institute for the Family
The institute is dedicated to the study, diagnosis and treatment of family relationship problems
Health
4
Jewish Board of Family & Children's
For 150 years, the jewish board of family and children's services, inc. ("the jewish board") has been helping new yorkers realize their potential and live as independently as possible. we promote resilience and recovery by addressing all…
Human Services
5
Arizona's Children Association
Providing child welfare and behavioral health services to arizona's children and families.
Human Services
6
Centerstone of Florida Inc
Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"
Health
7
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich
Jewish family services of greenwich responds to existing and emerging needs of individuals and families of all backgrounds, by providing accessible, expert social services to promote self-sufficiency and resilience, and to enhance quality…
—
8
Beachwood Center for Wellbeing
Beachwood provides integrative equine therapy to individuals with anxiety, trama, depression, loss and ptsd. all veterans, referrals from medical and mental health providers are treated free.
Health
9
Childsafe Colorado Inc
Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…
Crime & Legal
10
Jewish Family Services of Atlantic
Multiservice family counseling agency providing an array of social services and programs designed to meet the needs of individuals and families
—
11
Child Guidance Resource Centers
To provide high quality, community-based therapeutic, supportive, and preventive heathcare services for children, adolescents and families with mental health, development disability, and residential needs
Health
12
Interborough Developmental and Consultation
To provide the highest quality of mental health, medical and therapeutic services and ensure a continuum of care to the community.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dr Stanley and Pearl Goodman Jfs and the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Rainbow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$624,350Health$317,500Human Services$190,000Education$100,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TOMORROWS RAINBOW ↗
- Who funds JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON BEHAVIORIAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FORT LAUDERDALE INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST CALL FOR HELP OF BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER (CDTC) ↗
- Who funds CHILDNET INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL HEART2HEART INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Broward IncFL24.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Broward Behavioral Health Coalition Inc · United Way of Broward County Inc · Hfsf Grants Management Inc · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PARKLAND CARES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +83% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 650918564 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Parkland Cares Inc?
Find your warmest path to Parkland Cares Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines