Skip to content

· Private foundation

Parker Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$861kHealth$415kArts & Culture$384kHuman Services$368kReligion$194kEnvironment$166kFood & Nutrition$125kHousing & Shelter$116kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,775
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO$7,265
ARTPACE$5,550
SAN MARCOS RIVER FOUNDATION$5,550
TRINITY UNIVERSITY$4,490
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$3,700
SAN ANTONIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST$3,700
FRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO$2,775
THE WINSTON SCHOOL$2,775
CENIKOR$1,850
CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY$1,850
SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY$925
CASA OF SAN ANTONIO$925
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SAN ANTONIO$925
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $18k → 10%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $8k → 10%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $4k → 10%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $3k → 10%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $2k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $5k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $37k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $27k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $27k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $24k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $21k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $16k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $11k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $9k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $9k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 36 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
16

Total granted

$2.8M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+30%

Still filing today

58%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    Trinity University
    10× · 2017–2026 · $602k · revenue +83%
  • TW
    The Winston School
    10× · 2017–2026 · $208k · revenue +11%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    10× · 2017–2026 · $162k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • IA
    IMMIGRATION AND MIGRATION SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -1%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
2
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
3
San Antonio Pets Alive Inc

The mission of San Antonio Pets Alive! is to save every adoptable dog and cat in danger of being killed at the City of San Antonio Shelter.

Animals
4
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
5
San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries Inc

Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.

—
6
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
7
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
8
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
9
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
10
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

—
11
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
12
The Montessori School of San Antonio

The montessori school of san antonio (mssa) guides children to be passionate learners, independent thinkers, and engaged citizens. through the guiding principles of montessori curriculum and the school culture, children develop critical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Magdalene House of Austin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Winston School: $207,875 · OtherThe Winston SchoolCANCER THERAPY & RESEARCH CENTER: $179,200 · OtherCANCER THERAPY & RESEARCH CENTERSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $161,850 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRISTSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $124,350 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKALPHA HOME: $115,500 · OtherALPHA HOMEIndividual grant recipient: $106,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCASA OF SAN ANTONIO: $44,075 · Other+28 more: $368,425 · Other+28 moreTrinity University: $602,440 · EducationTrinity University+2 more: $9,900 · EducationARTPACE INC (AUDIT): $252,500 · Arts & CultureARTPACE INC (…MCNAY ART MUSEUM: $71,750 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUS…SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $19,100 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO M…+2 more: $3,100 · Arts & CultureRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $160,865 · Human ServicesRespite C…Christian Assistance Ministry: $38,850 · Human ServicesChristian…FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $34,950 · Human ServicesFOSTER VI…+1 more: $5,100 · Human ServicesPlanned Parenthood San Antonio: $116,475 · HealthSAN ANTONIO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $43,650 · HealthSan Marcos River Foundation: $146,250 · Environment+1 more: $1,600 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO INC: $49,625 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,307,625Education$612,340Arts & Culture$346,450Human Services$239,765Health$160,125Environment$147,850Philanthropy$51,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrinity University: $602,440 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetARTPACE INC (AUDIT): $252,500 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetThe Winston School: $207,875 over 10y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $161,850 over 10y, 2.8% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $160,865 over 10y, 0.6% of budgetSan Marcos River Foundation: $146,250 over 9y, 16% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $124,350 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood San Antonio: $116,475 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $71,750 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO INC: $49,625 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $43,650 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $39,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Assistance Ministry: $38,850 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFOSTER VILLAGE INC: $34,950 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $33,600 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $19,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST HEALING CENTER MINISTRIES: $18,100 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBrackenridge Park Conservancy: $17,250 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMAGDALENE HOUSE OF AUSTIN: $10,950 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTHE SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES: $6,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARYS HALL INC: $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWitte Museum: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLaity Renewal Foundation: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERLIN TUTTLES BAT CONSERVATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHONOR VETERANS NOW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds ARTPACE INC (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds The Winston School ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
  • Who funds San Marcos River Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood San Antonio ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST HEALING CENTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds MAGDALENE HOUSE OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO COALITION FOR VETERANS AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARYS HALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX35.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Brown Foundation Inc · Hannah Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Hixon Family Foundation · King Family Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Parker Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Parker Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph