Skip to content

· Private foundation

Park Dental Partners Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$207kEducation$161kHuman Services$20kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$571k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPLE TREE DENTAL$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$9,000
COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE$6,000
CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES$5,000
MINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION$5,000
SOUTH CENTRAL COLLEGE - MANKATO$1,500
NORMANDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
HERZING UNIVERSITY$1,500
CENTURY COLLEGE$1,500
SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC$1,500
DAKOTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$1,000
MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
ROCHESTER TECHNICAL COLLEGE$1,000
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE - NORTH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $4k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 46 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
7

Total granted

$438k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-20%

Still filing today

33%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    APPLE TREE DENTAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +88%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +111%
  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • DF
    DCTC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • MS
    MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Community & Technical College Foundation

The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through funds and provides part or all of the funding to the college to develop technical college foundation…

Education
2
Cambridge Community College Foundation

The mission of the cambridge campus foundation fulfills the potential of the students in east central minnesota, by expanding their opportunities and broadening their horizons with an affordable education and promise of a strong future.

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

Education
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Minnesota West Foundation

To offer scholarships to individuals and promote development opportunities at minnesota west community college through the development of external and internal constituencies of this corporation.

Education
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
9
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
10
Northcentral Technical College Foundation Inc

The ntc foundation develops relationships that enable individuals, businesses and the community to advocate for and provide resources in support of northcentral technical college in accomplishing its mission.

—
11
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
12
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APPLE TREE DENTAL: $60,500 · OtherAPPLE TREE DENTALUNIVERSITY OF MN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $24,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYMINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION - MISSION OF MERCY: $20,000 · OtherMINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION - MISSION OF MERCYHOPE CLINIC: $20,000 · OtherHOPE CLINICHERZING UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherDAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Other+38 more: $108,500 · Other+38 moreCOMMUNITY DENTAL CARE: $55,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY DENTAL CARECHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC: $44,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVIC…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $28,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNE…MINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 · EducationMINNESOTA DENTAL FO…Marquette University: $7,000 · EducationMarquette Universit…CENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationCENTURY COLLEGE FOU…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF…ROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG: $4,000 · EducationST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $19,410 · Human Services
Other$255,000Health$99,000Education$79,000Human Services$19,410

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPPLE TREE DENTAL: $60,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY DENTAL CARE: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC: $44,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $19,410 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMarquette University: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNormandale Community College Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIBBING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Well Disability Services: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARIBAULT AREA TRAINING AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds APPLE TREE DENTAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds Normandale Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG ↗
  • Who funds ST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIBBING COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Minnesota FoundationMN22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Allina Health System · Otto Bremer Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · Shavlik Family Charitable Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Park Dental Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park Dental Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Park Dental Partners Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Park Dental Partners Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Park Dental Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph