· Private foundation
Parikh Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AIM FOR SEVA | $35,000 |
| MSK CANCER CENTER | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $10,000 |
| THE AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CAMP HOWE | $5,000 |
| SMITH COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| NEW VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASS | $5,000 |
| GIFT FOR A DAY | $4,000 |
| NORTHAMPTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| EDUCATE GIRLS | $2,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA | $2,000 |
| NEPM | $1,670 |
| KQED | $1,670 |
| THE MOON CATCHER PROJECT | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AIALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +99%
- APAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +134%
- TMTHE MOONCATCHER PROJECT INC7× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +246%
Funded once
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGone grant, 2021 · $15k
- PPMVSone grant, 2021 · $6k
- SISEWA INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…
To support educational opportunities for underserved children in india, and raising support for and awareness of such activities in the united states.
To invest in educational programs in India to equip girls to define their own destiny.
Sister India provides a holistic program, protecting and uplifting women and girls, ending trafficking, child marriages and child labor, lifting families from poverty, and ensuring girls can go to school instead. We research effective…
Food for life vrindavan has been working in india since 1991. our work includes free meal distribution, cleaning and tree planting, paper recycling , organic farming, and a sewing and embroidery centre (providing training & employment…
Womankind uses the multidimensionality of its asian heritage to work alongside survivors of gender-based violence as they build a path to healing.
Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To strengthen schools and improve girls' leadership and livelihood options.
Economic development of women
The creation of an association of the world's leading social entrepreneurs - men and women with system-changing solutions for the world's most urgent social problems - and fostering a global culture of everyone being a changemaker for the…
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds THE MOONCATCHER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NEW VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HOWE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHAMPTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATE GIRLS ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Parikh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parikh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
- Camp Howe Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Parikh’s filings →