Skip to content

· Private foundation

Parc Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$28kEducation$17kReligion$14kAnimals$14kPhilanthropy$11kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEVIER ANIMAL CARE CENTER$3,000
INTERVARSITY$2,400
PARTNERS IN PROGRESS$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%Wears Valley Ranch: $2k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 96% of Parc Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 4%.

Parc Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 14 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +137% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$109k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+5%

Still filing today

29%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +137%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SEVIER COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +139%
  • WV
    WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • RH
    Raines High School-Costa Rica Mission
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • RH
    RAINES HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • ML
    MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ in the Smokies Inc

Walking alongside men to live out their true purpose in christ throughout the masculine journey.

—
2
Access Services of Middle Tennessee

Provides support services to individuals with disabilities in the form of outreach, training education, consultants and referrals requarding use of assistive technologies.

—
3
Kingdom Dog Ministries

To share the Word of God of Obedience through Kingdom Dogs

Religion
4
Cbm of the Upper Cumberland Region of Tn Inc

Our mission is reaching children and families teaching them to love God His Word and His created world. Camp Ozone provides summer camps retreats and teaching to instruct children and families in Biblical principles.

Religion
5
Tmm Ministries Inc

The mission of TMM Ministries is to influence people for Jesus Christ. This is accomplished by conducting camps retreats and training sessions for children youth and adults at Cumberland Springs Bible Camp where the gospel of Jesus Christ…

Recreation & Sports
6
Smoky Mountains Outreach Foundation
—
7
Smoky Mountain Area Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide assistance to individuals in sevier county who are temporarily in financial difficulty through the issuance of vouchers for utilities, rent, lodging, etc., and through our hot meals for hungry hearts program.

Health
8
Living Water Ranch

Providing unique outreach weekends where families and church groups may come to participate in bible studies and christian fellowship while enjoying various recreational activities for the whole family.

—
9
Wesley Pines Conference Retreat & Camping Center

The mission statement of camp wesley pines speaks of the commitment to continuing the ministry of christ by serving the united methodist church and by providing a christian environment for people of all ages amidst the beauty and grandeur…

Religion
10
Keep Sevier Beautiful

The organizations purpose is to encourage litter prevention, recycling and solid waste reduction in sevier county, tennessee

Arts & Culture
11
Soddy Daisy Firefighters Associatio

For the protection from fire in soddy daisy tn

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Christ in the Rockies

Provides two one-week outdoor camping adventures to the benefit of fathers and sons.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Leadership Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Way of Sevier County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERVARSITY: $19,200 · OtherINTERVARSITYIndividual grant recipient: $17,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY OF SEVIER COUNTY: $10,555 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SEVIER COUNTYPARTNERS IN PROGRESS: $9,606 · OtherPARTNERS IN PROGRESSRaines High School-Costa Rica Mission: $8,580 · OtherRaines High School-Costa Rica MissionRAINES HIGH SCHOOL: $8,109 · OtherRAINES HIGH SCHOOLSEVIER ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $7,500 · OtherSEVIER ANIMAL CARE CENTERCOMMUNITY GIVING -THANKSGIVING FOOD: $5,908 · OtherPETS WITHOUT PARENTS: $5,109 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,550 · Other+14 more: $22,501 · Other+14 moreLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST: $13,956 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK LEADERS…WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $3,928 · Human ServicesWEARS VALLEY RAN…Smoky Mountain Service Dogs: $3,600 · Human ServicesSmoky Mountain S…MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSmoky Mountain Resort Ministries Inc: $3,000 · ReligionALZHEIMERS TENNESSEE INC: $1,619 · Health
Other$118,728Human Services$21,484Youth Development$5,000Religion$3,000Health$1,619

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST: $13,956 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SEVIER COUNTY: $10,555 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSmoky Mountain Resort Ministries Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetALZHEIMERS TENNESSEE INC: $1,619 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SEVIER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Service Dogs ↗
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Resort Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERWOOD SERVICE DOGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parc Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parc Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph