Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pamela Steele White Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Pamela Steele White Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Pamela Steele White Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
18
10
19
5
20
14
21
14
22
15
23
16
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$988kEducation$109kArts & Culture$55kEnvironment$34kEmployment$15kHealth$14kHousing & Shelter$6kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mirabel Pictures$6,000
The Country Club Employee Education$5,000
National Tropical Botanical Garden$3,000
Pioneer Institute$1,250
The Carroll School$1,000
La Scuola Intrenational School$1,000
High Spirit Community Farm$1,000
Symbiosis$1,000
Horizonzs for Homeless Children$1,000
New England Conservatory$1,000
The Nature Conservancy$1,000
Wellwood Climate Research Central$1,000
Cure Alzheimer's Fund$1,000
Phillips Exeter Academy$1,000
Alliance For Women Executives$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Horizonzs for Homeless Children: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$226k · 24 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$226k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+69%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureScience & TechHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILTON ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +19%
  • NT
    NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +158%
  • THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • OM
    Open Mind
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • OW
    Old Whaling Church
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dexter Southfield Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%37%20–35yr12%6%35–55yr12%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr18%85%20–35yr12%0%35–55yr12%9%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
5,586/42,645

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $980,295 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMILTON ACADEMY — $60,000 · EducationMILTON ACAD…THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC — $23,400 · EducationTHE EPIPHAN…THE COUNTRY CLUB EMPLOYEE EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 · EducationTHE COUNTRY…NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $8,000 · EducationNEW ENGLAND…PIONEER INSTITUTE INC — $7,500 · EducationPIONEER INS…PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $6,500 · Education+9 more — $10,250 · Education+9 moreMirabel Pictures — $43,000 · Arts & CultureCAPE COD MARITIME MUSEUMINC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureMass Genl-Dementia Caregiver Collab — $5,000 · OtherEarn Haddord Fund — $5,000 · OtherSymbiosis — $3,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,250 · OtherMV Hospital — $2,000 · OtherSymbiosis Learning Center — $2,000 · OtherWe Own Tv Arthur — $2,000 · OtherWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $2,000 · Other+25 more — $16,050 · OtherNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $27,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentHIGH SPIRIT COMMUNITY FARM INC — $4,500 · Housing & ShelterALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,000 · HealthHealthy Waltham Inc — $500 · Health
Philanthropy$982,295Education$130,650Arts & Culture$45,000Other$42,800Environment$29,000Housing & Shelter$4,500Health$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $980,295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMirabel Pictures — $43,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $27,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC — $23,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COUNTRY CLUB EMPLOYEE EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIONEER INSTITUTE INC — $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH SPIRIT COMMUNITY FARM INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetV G C FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLA SCUOLA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD MARITIME MUSEUMINC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Waltham Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOVER FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826 Valencia — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGARTOWN PATROLMEN'S ASSOCIATION I — $350 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · MacPherson Fund Inc · Hoerle Foundation Inc · The Loring Wolcott & Coolidge Charitable Trust-I · Fidelity Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pamela Steele White Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • High Spirit Community Farm Inc54% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc38% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc24% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children21% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • New England Conservatory of Music1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc0% of income from government
  • Wheaton College0% of income from government
  • The Fessenden School0% of income from government
  • Milton Academy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pamela Steele White Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pamela Steele White Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph