Skip to content

· Public charity

Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp

To operate exclusively for the purposes enumerated in the iowa gaming commission act.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$463k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$4.5MEducation$1.9MRecreation & Sports$432kPublic Safety & Disaster$294kCommunity Improvement$272kEnvironment$196kHealth$181kReligion$96kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $378k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $891k
  • $250k+2 grants · $799k
$27,150
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNDER 5000$462,789
CITY OF EMMETSBURG$336,509
EMMETSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST$112,000
Individual grant recipient$109,341
RUTHVEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPOR$104,580
IOWA LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE$99,263
PALO ALTO COUNTY HOSPITAL$75,000
CITY OF GRAETTINGER$73,597
CITY OF WEST BEND$69,067
FIVE ISLAND TRAIL CORPORATION$69,000
CITY OF RUTHVEN$62,763
WEST BEND- MALLARD COMMUNITY SCHOOL$61,800
RUTHVEN- AYRSHIRE COMMUNITY SCHOOL$54,150
RUTHVAN COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$38,766
HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COU$32,993
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COU: $33k → 11%HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO CTY: $23k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.8M · 29 repeat orgs$552k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$9.8M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+70%

Still filing today

21%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $415k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementMembership BenefitHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    Grotto of the Redemption
    4× · 2017–2020 · $70k · revenue +2%
  • HU
    HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COUNTY INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue +32%
  • PA
    PALO ALTO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $37k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • EY
    EMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN
    one grant, 2017 · $37k · revenue -76% · 68% of their budget
  • EC
    EMMETSBURG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -65%
  • PL
    PRAIRIE LAKES AREA EDUCATION AREA
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adams Community Economic Development Corporation

Commuity economic development and industrial development in adams county iowa.

—
2
Guttenberg Economic & Industrial Development Commi

The Corporation is organized for the purpose or purposes of promoting the economic and industrial development of the City of Guttenberg, Iowa and its environs. Such promotion shall include not only the enticement, assistance, and…

Community Improvement
3
Cozad Development Corporation

Foster Business Development in Cozad, NE

—
4
Altoona Area Chamber of Commerce

The promotion of altoona, ia

Community Improvement
5
Des Moines Golf and Country Club Educational Foundation
—
6
Western Iowa Development Assoc

Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa

—
7
Endow Glidden

To establish an endowment fund to enhance the quality of life of the citizens of Glidden, Iowa

Philanthropy
8
Alton Economic Development Corporation

To provide the city of alton, iowa with economic development possibilities ranging from residential, industrial and commercial development. the organization will make available places of residence and work attracting people to the city of…

Community Improvement
9
Sioux City Jewish Cemetery Association

Cemetery care and maintenance

—
10
Gateway Development Corporation

Economic development

Community Improvement
11
Union County Historical Society

Preservation of union county iowa hisorical information and artifacts.

—
12
St John's Cemetery Association

Provision and Maintenance of a cemetary

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upper Des Moines Opportunity Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Johns Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF EMMETSBURG: $2,512,496 · OtherCITY OF EMMETSBURGUNDER 5000: $1,870,330 · OtherUNDER 5000EMMETSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST: $672,598 · OtherEMMETSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTCITY OF GRAETTINGER: $668,921 · OtherCITY OF GRAETTINGERCITY OF WEST BEND: $553,166 · OtherCITY OF WEST BENDCITY OF RUTHVEN: $531,833 · Other+35 more: $3,264,134 · Other+35 morePALO ALTO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $37,080 · Recreation & SportsGRAETTINGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $26,341 · Recreation & SportsSPRING HILLS COUNTRY CLUB INC: $11,155 · Recreation & SportsHORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COUNTY INC: $55,493 · Human ServicesUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $29,339 · Community ImprovementEMMETSBURG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 · Community ImprovementST JOHNS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $40,131 · Membership BenefitRuthven Community Care Center Inc: $38,766 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $33,250 · Philanthropy
Other$10,073,478Recreation & Sports$74,576Human Services$55,493Community Improvement$49,339Membership Benefit$40,131Health$38,766Philanthropy$33,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COUNTY INC: $55,493 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRuthven Community Care Center Inc: $38,766 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPALO ALTO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $37,080 over 4y, 18% of budgetEMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN: $36,705 over 1y, 68% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $33,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $29,339 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAETTINGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $26,341 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEMMETSBURG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGRAETTINGER COMMUNITY APARTMENTS: $11,801 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Grotto of the Redemption ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Ruthven Community Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PALO ALTO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAETTINGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds EMMETSBURG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop’s filings →

    More from the funding graph