How much did PALO ALTO CTY GAMING DEVELOP CORP grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of PALO ALTO CTY GAMING DEVELOP CORP’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

03FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

$10k–50k9 grants · $238k
$50k–250k6 grants · $488k
$250k+2 grants · $710k

$49,563

Median grant

States reached

$4.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNDER 5000$368,880
CITY OF EMMETSBURG$341,038
PALO ALTO COUNTY$113,488
EMMETSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST$101,541
CITY OF GRAETTINGER$74,503
CITY OF WEST BEND$72,701
CITY OF RUTHVEN$63,535
FIVE ISLAND TRAIL CORPORATION$62,605
WEST BEND- MALLARD COMMUNITY SCHOOL$49,563
GRAETTINGER-TERRIL COMM SCHOOL$48,478
RUTHVEN- AYRSHIRE COMMUNITY SCHOOL$30,626
CITY OF AYRSHIRE$25,161
CITY OF MALLARD$23,806
EMMETSBURG CATHOLIC SCHOOL$22,906
CITY OF CYLINDER$14,068

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$8.1M · 25 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.1M

$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%

+53%

Still filing today

12%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementMembership BenefitHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FI
FIVE ISLAND TRAIL CORPORATION
6× · 2017–2022 · $2.1M
U5
UNDER 5000
6× · 2017–2022 · $1.4M
VV
VALLEY VIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
6× · 2017–2022 · $595k

Funded once

EY
EMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN
one grant, 2017 · $37k · revenue -76% · 68% of their budget
CF
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NE IOWAgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +53%
HU
HORIZONS UNLIMITED OF PALO ALTO CTY
one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Keokuk Economic Development

Economic development for keokuk, ia and surrounding community.

Community Improvement

Altoona Area Chamber of Commerce

The promotion of altoona, ia

Community Improvement

Iowa Parks and Recreation Assoc

To assist members in the development of their careers and to support lasting parks and recreation systems.

—

Perry Economic Development Inc

Economic development for perry, iowa

Community Improvement

Dubuque County Historical Society

To interpret and protect the life, history and culture of our region and rivers.

Arts & Culture

Adams Community Economic

Commuity economic development and industrial development in adams county iowa.

—

Western Iowa Development Assoc

Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa

—

Regional Development Authority

To award grants to community non-profit agencies for charitable purposes in accordance with the iowa excursion gambling act.

—

Alton Economic Development

To provide the city of alton, iowa with economic development possibilities ranging from residential, industrial and commercial development. the organization will make available places of residence and work attracting people to the city of…

Community Improvement

North Iowa Community Action Organization

To provide quality services that empower people in need to achieve and sustain economic stability through collaborative efforts.

—

Hartford Area Development

Promote the growth of the city of hartford, sd

Community Improvement

Iowa City Area Development Group

The organization promotes, develops and advances the business community in iowa city and the surrounding area. in addition, the organization connects business and industry with federal, state and local resources to enable and stimulate…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upper Des Moines Opportunity Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Johns Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/11

Grantees still filing

9/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,096,277Recreation & Sports$50,264Membership Benefit$40,131Philanthropy$33,250Community Improvement$25,612Human Services$22,500Housing & Shelter$11,801Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PALO ALTO CTY GAMING DEVELOP CORP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 420823546 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EMMETSBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 68% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp?

Find your warmest path to Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PALO ALTO CTY GAMING DEVELOP CORP

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp?

More from the funding graph

PALO ALTO CTY GAMING DEVELOP CORP

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Palo Alto Cty Gaming Develop Corp?

More from the funding graph