Skip to content

· Private foundation

Padgett Hilda M Charit Scholar

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$228kReligion$78kHuman Services$66kMembership Benefit$39kHealth$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,515
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,157
Individual grant recipient$4,954
Individual grant recipient$4,954
Individual grant recipient$3,853
Individual grant recipient$3,470
Individual grant recipient$2,908
JENNA CHURCHEY$2,616
Individual grant recipient$2,616
Individual grant recipient$2,515
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL$2,500
HOPE SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,000
HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC$2,000
LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $2k → 7%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL YMCA: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL: $5k → 8%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $5k → 8%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%LIONS OF ILLINOIS FDN: $5k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 14%MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL: $3k → 8%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%THE SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL YMCA: $5k → 11%Bloomington-Normal YMCA: $5k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL YMCA: $5k → 11%BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL YMCA: $5k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL YMCA: $5k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 20 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$403k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+6%

Still filing today

20%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +95%
  • LO
    Lions of Illinois Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +2%
  • TH
    THE HOPE SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $29k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UU
    UNION UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
4
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
9
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
12
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University; the most unlike its peers is The Hope School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $44,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $41,051 · OtherHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INCAMERICAN LEGION L E DAVIS 56: $39,218 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION L E DAVIS 56TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $36,718 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $36,718 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLions of Illinois Foundation: $36,218 · OtherLions of Illinois FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $31,218 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOOSEHEART CHARITIES: $29,386 · OtherMOOSEHEART CHARITIES+30 more: $136,630 · Other+30 moreTHE HOPE SCHOOL: $29,386 · EducationTHE HOPE SC…UNION UNIVERSITY: $6,854 · EducationUNION UNIVE…BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,285 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $2,285 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $2,285 · EducationVanderbilt University: $2,285 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,285 · EducationTHE HOPE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education
Other$431,357Education$49,665

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC: $41,051 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLions of Illinois Foundation: $36,218 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HOPE SCHOOL: $29,386 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC: $7,332 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $6,854 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Lions of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Padgett Hilda M Charit Scholar funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Padgett Hilda M Charit Scholar. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Padgett Hilda M Charit Scholar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph