How much did PACIFICSOURCE FOUNDATION FOR grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of PACIFICSOURCE FOUNDATION FOR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

healthy challengechallenge awardinnovativebasic healthcareincome uninsuredproduce stipendstipend healthy

2019

healthy challengestudentschallenge awardcare vulnerablehouseholdsexpansionpsychiatric residential

2020

housing solutionssolutions high-riskhigh-risk homelesshomeless populationempowercreatehousing emergency

2021

increasing healthincreasing foodpacific northwestcolumbiaadults mentalhousing employmenthealing

2022

latinx healthhealth welfarehealthcare clinicstaffingfood systemhealth clinicfood pantry

2023

access underservedhealthcare clinichearingsalemgirlsmealsfood pantry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k40 grants · $1.2M
$50k–250k6 grants · $314k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

NURTURELY$60,000
POCATELLO FREE CLINIC$54,000
YOUTH HOMES$50,000
GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH$50,000
MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA$50,000
PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE$50,000
IDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE$45,000
TODOS JUNTOS$40,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY & CENTRAL COAST$40,000
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$40,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES$40,000
SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC$40,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC LANE$40,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - MONTANA$40,000
WELLNESS TREE CLINIC$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 100 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +113% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100

128

Total granted

$11M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%

+56%

Still filing today

64%

54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $410k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LH
LEGACY HEALTH FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2021 · $500k · revenue +140%
CF
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY COUNSELING
8× · 2017–2024 · $341k · revenue +5% · 41% of their budget
SALEM FREE CLINICS
8× · 2017–2024 · $330k · revenue +113%

Funded once

CC
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE
one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -4%
DE PAUL TREATMENT CENTERSgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +97%
OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services

Partnership Health Center Inc

Medical, dental, and mental health services for low income, uninsured, and underinsured patients in the missoula, montana region.

—

Community Action Center

The center provides resources and direct services to low income residents.

Human Services

Northeast Oregon Network

To promote Eastern Oregon health by reducing personal and regional barriers for residents.

Health

Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Volunteer Health Care Services

Health

La Pine Community Health Center

La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.

Health

LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services

Umpqua Community Health Center

Provide quality, compassionate, accessible & affordable healthcare to the people of douglas county.

Health

Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health

Northwest Community Health Care

The organization is a federally qualified health center that provides primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related patient support services to more than 18,000 individuals regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Cascade Community Healthcare

Our mission is to provide compassionate and encouraging counseling, leading to a renewed sense of hope and the ability to make positive changes and live more satisfying lives.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Deschutes County and the most unlike its peers is Medical Teams International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/151

the rest of the field

10%

2,407/25,280

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

148 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

145/148

Grantees still filing

122/148

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,180,130Health$3,238,468Human Services$2,234,000International$600,000Crime & Legal$542,338Food & Nutrition$474,529Housing & Shelter$362,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR92.3× affinity93 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall · Chambers Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PACIFICSOURCE FOUNDATION FOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

Farmers Market Fund — 100% of income from government
South Willamette Solutions — 100% of income from government
Oregon Marshallese Community Association — 100% of income from government
South Wasco Alliance — 100% of income from government
Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
Community Outreach Through — 70% of income from government
Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
The Foundation for Medical Excellence — 66% of income from government
Todos Juntos Inc — 64% of income from government
Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
High Desert Food & Farm Alliance — 45% of income from government
Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
Project Able — 45% of income from government
Pathfinder Clubhouse — 44% of income from government
Raices de Bienestar — 41% of income from government
The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
Old Mill Center for Children — 38% of income from government
Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
Salem for Refugees — 35% of income from government
Centro de Servicios Para Campesinos — 29% of income from government
White Bird Clinic — 29% of income from government
Central Oregon Fuse Inc — 28% of income from government
Comunidad y Herencia Cultural — 28% of income from government
Clatsop Community Action — 26% of income from government
Micronesian Islander Community — 25% of income from government
Oregon Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation — 24% of income from government
Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
Capaces Leadership Institute — 20% of income from government
Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services — 11% of income from government
Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
Nurturely — 10% of income from government
Wellmama Inc — 9% of income from government
Neighborhood Health Center — 9% of income from government
Sponsors Inc — 8% of income from government
Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
Boys & Girls Club of Albany — 7% of income from government
Clackamas Volunteers in Medicine — 7% of income from government
Our Community Birth Center — 6% of income from government
Centro De Ayuda — 5% of income from government
North By Northeast — 4% of income from government
Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of — 3% of income from government
The Boys & Girls Aid Society of Oregon — 3% of income from government
Salem Leadership Foundation — 3% of income from government
Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
Oregon Health & Science University — 1% of income from government
William Temple House — 0% of income from government

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

21get no government money at all

9rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF MONTANA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 810289661 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF MONTANA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pacificsource Foundation For?

Find your warmest path to Pacificsource Foundation For through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PACIFICSOURCE FOUNDATION FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

148 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pacificsource Foundation For?

More from the funding graph

PACIFICSOURCE FOUNDATION FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

148 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pacificsource Foundation For?

More from the funding graph