Skip to content

· Public charity

Ozark Outdoor Foundation

Ozark foundation ozf is a community-supported 501c3 charitable organization focused on positioning our state as a premier outdoor recreation destination.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MYouth Development$410kHealth$80kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$41kEducation$20kCivil Rights$14kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US Cup Group$46,446
Hincapie Events LLC$25,000
Rampy MS Research Foundation$16,700
Arkansas Race Solutions$14,000
The Joys of Swimming$8,130
NWA Youth Triathlon Organization$6,000
Studio Drift Inc The Delta Grind$5,000
Downtown Springdale Alliance$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NW AR CHILDRENS SHELTER: $6k → 8%JONES CENTER FOR FAMILIES INC: $20k → 14%JONES CENTER FOR FAMILIES INC: $20k → 14%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Ozark Outdoor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in AR; by stated purpose, 49%.

Ozark Outdoor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$729k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$1.1M
$685k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RAMPY MS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $62k · revenue +28%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON CO INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $48k · revenue +25%
  • SD
    STUDIO DRIFT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $355k
  • UP
    USA PUMPTRACK CHAMPIONSHIP LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • UC
    US CUP MOUNTAIN BIKE SERIES
    one grant, 2022 · $90k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bicycle Coalition of the Ozarks
—
2
Bike Walk Tennessee

Bike walk tennessee works to improve conditions for bicycling and walking in tennessee by advancing public policy, connecting and educating its members and constituents, and promoting best practices throught the state.

Recreation & Sports
3
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
4
Leborne Development

To create a healthy and competitive environment among talented junior cyclists, ages 13-18 as well as u23 riders, from the northwest arkansas region. we look to raise a generation of young cyclists who can compete at the regional, national…

Youth Development
5
Bicycle Rides Northwest

Cycling

—
6
Colorado Mountain Bike Association

COMBA is dedicated to protecting and improving mountain biking on the Colorado Front Range.

Recreation & Sports
7
Yellowstone River Parks Association

Ypra owns and manages 700 acres of natural park land for public use and helps federal, state, county, and city agencies with management of various parks and trails on public land along the yellowstone and all in yellowstone county.

Environment
8
Benton County Snowmobile Club Inc
—
9
Ballet Arkansas Inc

Provide world-class diverse innovative dance programming and education to arkansas and beyond.

Arts & Culture
10
The Brett Downey Safety Foundation

To increase safety awareness in riders, parents, track owners and promoters; make the sport of motorcross as safe as possible, minimizing injuries

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Ozark Greenways Inc

Serve the springfield area by building a trail system that connects and enhances our community. additional functions include education on active transportation and urban tree canopy enhancement and serving as a land trust for…

Environment
12
Partnership for the Pathway

Raise funds to build recreational paths throughout the city

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jones Center for Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Peel Compton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC: $387,500 · OtherALL SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INCIndividual grant recipient: $355,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEDAL TO THE MEDAL: $305,000 · OtherPEDAL TO THE MEDALUS CUP GROUP: $171,446 · OtherUS CUP GROUPUSA PUMPTRACK CHAMPIONSHIP LLC: $100,000 · OtherUSA PUMPTRACK CHAMPIONSHIP LLCUS CUP MOUNTAIN BIKE SERIES: $90,000 · OtherUS CUP MOUNTAIN BIKE SERIES+12 more: $186,991 · Other+12 moreRAMPY MS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $61,700 · HealthSPEAKUP ABOUT DRUGS: $18,289 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON CO INC: $47,500 · PhilanthropySTUDIO DRIFT: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JONES CENTER FOR FAMILIES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN OF OZ NWA: $6,345 · Recreation & SportsBENTONVILLE BELLA VISTA TRAILBLAZERS: $5,600 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN SPRINGDALE ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,595,937Health$79,989Philanthropy$72,500Human Services$52,000Recreation & Sports$11,945Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAMPY MS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $61,700 over 3y, 13% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON CO INC: $47,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JONES CENTER FOR FAMILIES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDIO DRIFT: $25,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSPEAKUP ABOUT DRUGS: $18,289 over 1y, 24% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN OF OZ NWA: $6,345 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBENTONVILLE BELLA VISTA TRAILBLAZERS: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Peel Compton Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAMPY MS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON CO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JONES CENTER FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO DRIFT ↗
  • Who funds SPEAKUP ABOUT DRUGS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF OZ NWA ↗
  • Who funds BENTONVILLE BELLA VISTA TRAILBLAZERS ↗
  • Who funds The Peel Compton Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SPRINGDALE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walton Family Foundation IncAR21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walton Family Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ozark Outdoor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ozark Outdoor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ozark Outdoor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph