Loading…
· Private foundation
OXMAN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$35k
Granted FY2024
15
Grants
5
Communities
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of OXMAN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
congregation
2019
—
2020
museumarts
2021
museumarts
2023
museumarts
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 15 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,130
Median grant
5
States reached
$965k
Total assets
Largest grants
- TEMPLE BETH EL$8,904
- JEWISH FEDERATION PINELLAS$5,680
- STRAZ CENTER$5,549
- FOUNDATION OF IND LIVING$3,510
- RUTH ECKERD HALL$2,805
- CENTRAL SYNAGOUGE$2,000
- WILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$1,423
- HADASSAH$1,130
- JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICES$1,080
- ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,021
- CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL$570
- MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$500
- THE FELLOWSHIP$250
- AMERICAN STAGE CO INC$250
- FREEFALL THEATRE COMPANY$250
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 18 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else
18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
18
28
Total granted
$188k
$10k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+3%
+12%
Still filing today
39%
7%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMENORAH MANOR2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +9%
- RERUTH ECKERD HALL3× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +3%
- WSWILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION5× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- GCGULF COAST JEWISH SERVICESone grant, 2019 · $4k
- FFFREE FALL THEATRE COMPANYone grant, 2023 · $548
- ASAPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Bioflorida Inc
Bioflorida is the voice of florida's life sciences industry, representing 8,600 establishments and research organizations in the biopharmaceutical, medical technology, and digital health sectors that collectively employ 107,000 floridians.
—
2
University of Florida
To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.
Education
3
University of Florida Alumni
Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…
Education
4
Florida West Coast Symphony Inc dba Sarasota Orchestra
To engage, educate and enrich our community through high quality live musical experiences.
Arts & Culture
5
Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc
Bethesda hospital foundation is a not-for-profit organization established for the benefit and support of bethesda hospital. its purpose is to assist the hospital in accomplishing its mission through the acquisition, management and…
—
6
Florida Research Center for
Philanthropy
7
Florida State University Alumni
To build a network of alumni and friends and sustain meaningful relationships on behalf of florida state university. this vision is accomplished through engaging alumni and friends via programs and services that foster pride and enhance a…
Education
8
Florida West Coast Public Broadcasting
Wedu is a public media resource that uses storytelling and community (see schedule o, page 40)engagement to create a more informed public.
Arts & Culture
9
Florida Sports Foundation Incorporated
Florida sports foundation (fsf), serves as florida's lead organization in promoting and developing florida's sports industry. in partnership with florida's sports commissions and other organizations throughout the state, the main focus of…
Recreation & Sports
10
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
Environment
11
Florida Grand Opera Inc
To enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. florida grand opera aims to be a driving force of cultural growth in south florida through the presentation of the most comprehensive art form in the world -…
Arts & Culture
12
South Florida Symphony Orchestra
Remaining true to its mission to delight, inspire and educate the community, south florida symphony orchestra (sfso) performed more than 50 in person concerts and events for patrons throughout the south florida region, including monroe,…
Arts & Culture
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Florida Orchestra and the most unlike its peers is South Florida Pbs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$205,735Human Services$7,122Arts & Culture$6,955Health$3,403Civil Rights$2,495
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OXMAN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Florida Holocaust Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 592656932 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Oxman Charitable Fund Trust?
Find your warmest path to Oxman Charitable Fund Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines