Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ouida and Doc Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$223kHealth$153kEducation$142kHuman Services$52kYouth Development$25kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER$25,000
UH FOUNDATION$22,000
WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
MAUI FOOD BANK$11,000
KAUAI FOOD BANK$11,000
FOOD BASKET INC$11,000
ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 9%WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 9%WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 9%WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $9k → 9%WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -89% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$595k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-89%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $142k · revenue +132%
  • HH
    HAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k · revenue +60%
  • MAUI FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • OK
    OHANA KOMPUTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waikiki Health

To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
2
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
3
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
4
Kuakini Foundation

The mission of kuakini foundation is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs;…

—
5
Waianae Distr Comprehensive Health &

The waianae coast comprehensive health center ("the health center") is a healing center that provides accessible and affordable medical and traditional healing services with aloha. the health center is a learning center that offers health…

Health
6
Hokah Area Food Shelf
Food & Nutrition
7
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
8
Kapi'olani Medical Specialists

Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…

Health
9
Hawaii Education Institute
—
10
Hawaii Workers Center

The hawaii workers center envisions a hawaii in which all workers are empowered to exercise their right to organize for their social, economic and political well-being.

Education
11
Kaialahui Foundation

To empower hawaiis farming community to enhance food production and distribution through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
12
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kauai Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Hawaii Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $87,500 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INCTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $68,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BASKET INCKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $67,500 · Food & NutritionKAUAI FOOD BANK INCUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $142,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUND…HAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER INC: $118,000 · HealthHAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER …WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $52,000 · Human ServicesWAIKIKI C…BAY CLINIC INC: $35,000 · OtherOHANA KOMPUTER: $5,000 · OtherADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH: $25,000 · Youth Development
Food & Nutrition$223,000Education$142,000Health$118,000Human Services$52,000Other$40,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $142,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER INC: $118,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $87,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $68,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $67,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetWAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER: $52,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBAY CLINIC INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOHANA KOMPUTER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAMAKUA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds KAUAI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WAIKIKI COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds OHANA KOMPUTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation IncMD15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ouida and Doc Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ouida and Doc Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ouida and Doc Hill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ouida and Doc Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ouida and Doc Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph