Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Orville L and Beverly Borgmann Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of ORVILLE L AND BEVERLY BORGMANN CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,074
Median grant
2
States reached
$249k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,074
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,149
FORT HAYS TECH NORTH CENTRAL$1,074
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-KEARNEY$1,000
KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%HASTINGS COLLEGE: $2k → 11%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-KEARNEY: $1k → 13%BOISE BIBLE COLLEGE: $1k → 8%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%CLEVELAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 5%COLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%STERLING COLLEGE: $1k → 11%FORT HAYS TECH NORTH CENTRAL: $1k → 12%CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 13%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $2k → 15%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 18%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $2k → 17%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%CLEVELAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 5%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $2k → 17%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER: $1k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $2k → 17%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $2k → 17%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$138k · 16 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$138k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Southern College of Optometry
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +29%
  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CU
    Creighton University
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • PS
    PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
7
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
8
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Wesleyan University and the most unlike its peers is Hastings College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY — $56,736 · OtherFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITYKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY — $28,903 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY — $11,631 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY+15 more — $30,577 · Other+15 moreSouthern College of Optometry — $6,884 · EducationSouthern Colleg…DRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSIT…HASTINGS COLLEGE — $2,229 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEG…KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $1,800 · EducationKANSAS WESLEYAN…Creighton University — $1,500 · EducationCreighton Unive…Grand Canyon University — $1,085 · EducationBenedictine College — $1,000 · EducationSTERLING COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationBOISE BIBLE COLLEGE INC — $1,000 · Education
Other$127,847Education$20,998

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouthern College of Optometry — $6,884 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE — $2,229 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE BIBLE COLLEGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern College of Optometry
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE
  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds Benedictine College
  • Who funds STERLING COLLEGE
  • Who funds BOISE BIBLE COLLEGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship TrustKS15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Bill & Julia Thomas Charitable Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Orville L and Beverly Borgmann Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph