Skip to content
Oregon Network of Child Abuse Intervention Centers at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Oregon Network of Child Abuse Intervention Centers

To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.

$78k
Granted FY2017
8
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $71,766, the rows itemized in this filing. The $77,660 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,894 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARES Northwest$9,000
Lincoln Cty Children Adv Ctr$9,000
Childrens Center$9,000
Childrens Advocacy Ctr$9,000
The Star Center$9,000
KIDS Center$9,000
ABC House$9,000
Kids FIRST Center$8,766
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABC House: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Childrens Center: $9,000 · Crime & LegalChildrens CenterKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $9,000 · Crime & LegalKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNO…JACKSON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASK FORCE DBA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $9,000 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE T…The Star Center: $9,000 · OtherThe Star CenterCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $9,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S ADV…ABC HOUSE INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INCRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthRANDALL CHILDR…FRIENDS OF THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $8,766 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF TH…
Crime & Legal$18,000Other$18,000Civil Rights$9,000Human Services$9,000Health$9,000Community Improvement$8,766

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildrens Center: $9,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $9,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetABC HOUSE INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASK FORCE DBA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $8,766 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford Family Found…The Oregon Community …National Children's A…Storms Family Foundat…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…The Roundhouse Founda…The Collins FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ford Family FoundationOR19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · National Children's Alliance Inc · Storms Family Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Network of Child Abuse Intervention Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Network of Child Abuse Intervention Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Friends of the Child Advocacy Center Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Abc House Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Childrens Center: 0% of income from government
  • Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Network of Child Abuse Intervention Centers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home